Definitions below are from Merriam-Webster Online, and are included for clarification, to improve communication. I have deleted pronunciation keys, etymology, etc., for brevity's sake.
Main Entry:
in·san·i·ty
1 : a deranged state of the mind usually occurring as a specific disorder (as schizophrenia)
3 a : extreme folly or unreasonableness
b : something utterly foolish or unreasonable
I deleted sense #2, the legal definition, because I intend here only to address derangement, folly and unreason, and some of the ways in which they exist as endemic norms and even cherished institutions in our culture.
Main Entry:
norm
1 : an authoritative standard
: MODEL2 :
a principle of right action binding upon the members of a group and
serving to guide, control, or regulate proper and acceptable behavior
3 : AVERAGE: as
a : a set standard of development or achievement usually derived from the average or median achievement of a large group
b : a pattern or trait taken to be typical in the behavior of a social group
c : a widespread or usual practice, procedure, or custom
: RULE <standing ovations became the
norm>
I left out a fourth sense of "norm", applicable to mathematics and statistics.
Main Entry:
1en·dem·ic
1 a : belonging or native to a particular people or country
b : characteristic of or prevalent in a particular field, area, or environment <problems
endemic to translation> <the self-indulgence
endemic in the film industry>
Sense #2 of "endemic" got the axe because it is more narrow than my intention here. Insanity is so broadly endemic in Western culture that it is normal to possess some psychopathology, "neurosis," or personality disorder. Virtually the only persons without crippling or dangerous psychopathology are a few small children and those persons who have been in psychotherapy of some sort.
The mainstream culture is so nutty that it stigmatizes those who have been in psychotherapy. "In the land of the sick, the healthy man will be tracked down, tortured and slain." Employers can legally discriminate against us for having our mental illnesses treated. If one manages to stay under the radar and avoid professional diagnosis and treatment, one is free to enter contracts, to carry guns and wield power over life and death in the military or paramilitary police forces, and to hold public office.
Religion is part of the problem. There are manifold ways in which various religions indoctrinate their believers to deny observable facts and defy reason. I'll focus only on one little insanity in the religion of which I have the most knowledge and experience, and can quote chapter and verse.
Biblical injunctions (New International Version, from Bible Gateway):
Exodus 21: 23-25
23 But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life,
24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
25 burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.
Many self professed Christians advocate and practice such "justice," despite Romans 12:19
Do not take revenge, my friends, but leave room for God's wrath, for it is written: "It is mine to avenge; I will repay," [quoting Deuteronomy 32:35] says the Lord.
and Matthew 5:39
But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.
It is so distressful in one's mind to hold contradictory beliefs, that this pathological circumstance, known in psychological jargon as cognitive dissonance, can engender cascades of consequent pathologies unless the dissonance is resolved. People may resolve the dissonance by blocking out one side of the conflict or the other. In the case of the fear-based Old Testament injunctions versus the more loving New Testament ones, the decision of which to observe and which to discount usually depends on how a person was reared.
Proverbs 13:24
He who spares the rod hates his son,
but he who loves him is careful to discipline him.
Proverbs 22:15:
Folly is bound up in the heart of a child,
but the rod of discipline will drive it far from him.
Proverbs 23:13-14
Do not withhold discipline from a child;
if you punish him with the rod, he will not die.
Punish him with the rod
and save his soul from death.
The ability of self-professed followers of the Prince of Peace to give as much credence as they do to abusive and warlike Old Testament laws and customs never ceases to amaze me. In an article on a handy new product for Christian families, called THE ROD, Dorothy Neddermeyer, PhD, quotes from the advertising:
Features:
• Flexible nylon rod—leaves the right amount of sting without injury
• Cushioned vinyl grip (manufactured for bicycle handle)—easy on parents hands and prevents stress on hand/arm muscles
• Balanced—assures accuracy
• Lightweight—your hand/arm doesn’t tire during use
• Safety tip—prevents the nylon from developing rough edges
• Convenient—fits easily into a purse or diaper bag
• Affordable—buy one for the kitchen, bedroom, car, wherever
• Unbreakable—will last a life time
• Guaranteed—satisfaction or your money back
Benefits:
• Spoons are for cooking
• Belts are for holding up pants
• Hands are for loving
• Rods are for chastening—Proverbs 23:13-14 AND Proverbs 22:15.Dr. Neddermeyer goes on to say,
Those people who believe chastening is commended in the Bible,
specifically the book of Proverbs, have misinterpreted the Bible. There
is a distinction between the practice in King Solomon’s day of beating
people on the back and the modern American habit of buttocks hitting,
chastening, spanking of children. The latter is not prescribed anywhere
in the Bible. Furthermore, it needs to be pointed out that the Old
Testament contains passages that could be (and in some incidents have
been) construed as divine endorsements of wife-beating, racial warfare,
slavery, the stoning to death of rebellious children and other
behaviors that are outrageous by today’s standards. As Shakespeare once
wrote, “The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose.”
Chastening,
a.k.a. hitting/switching/whipping/corporal punishment, can weaken the
survivor’s immune system according to Dr. Frank Putnam of the National
Institute of Mental Health and Dr. Martin Teicher of Harvard Medical
School. Putnam conducted studies of 170 girls, 6-15 years old—half had
been subjected to ‘corporal punishment,’ half had not---for seven
years. The abused girls displayed symptoms such as:
• Abnormally high stress hormones, which can kill neurons in brain areas crucial for thinking and memory
• High levels of an antibody that weaken the immune system
Teicher
completed a series of brain studies on 402 children and adults, many of
whom had been physically abused. His finds revealed that physical abuse
creates:
• Arrested growth of the left hemisphere of the brain which can hamper development of language and logic
• Growth of the right hemisphere of the brain (the site for emotion) at an abnormally early age
The
result of a weakened immune system includes more profound as well as
seldom recognized physical aftereffects such as: vaginal, ovarian,
prostate, testicular or breast cancer, PMS, MS, fibromyalgia, to name a
few of the most prominent illness as a result of surviving physical
abuse. Louise Hay in her Book, Heal Your Body—The Mental Causes for
Physical Illness and the Metaphysical Ways to Overcome Them, cited her
own vaginal cancer as an example of a weakened immune system due to
physical/sexual abuse and how Metaphysical healing can heal the body.
Our
laws and our cultural values are unambiguous concerning adults who
physically attack or verbally threaten adults. Such behavior is
recognized as criminal, and we hold the offenders accountable. Why
then, when so much is at stake for society, do we accept the convoluted
thinking and excuses of child of child abusers—all in the name of
religion?
Why do we become interested in the needs of children
only after they have been terribly victimized, or have become
delinquents victimizing others?
She continues, answering that question and providing a reading list of authoritative and informative sources, HERE. Such solutions go beyond the scope of my intention for this essay. A brief and eloquent blog entry with a personal perspective (not mine) on this subject is HERE. I'm sure that any of you could find many others with a little web search, and most of you can tell stories of your own abuse.
I want to look at other manifestations of the broader problem, the insanity of our society. The incident which set this topic in my mind for the past couple of days was someone who characterized hatred as a "personal preference." I would categorize hatred as psychopathology, a symptom that goes along with other manifestations of internalized fear in diagnoses such as paranoia, oppositional defiant disorder, sado-masochism, and post-traumatic stress disorder.
Is it political correctness that allows people to think they can get away with saying that they simply prefer to hate? The efforts of some people to promote, through euphemistic speech, peace and acceptance in a diverse culture has gone awry. Euphemisms and their usage have gotten so warped, so interwoven with the endemic insanity of the culture, that in many cases political correctness fails to engender tolerance of people as individuals. Instead, it promotes acceptance of pathological ideas and limiting, backward-thinking beliefs.
I think we can accept and tolerate each other while confronting pathology, insanity, hatred and abuse. Does that make me some bastard child of Pollyanna and Candide? Hatred and abuse, the pathologies and insanity that arise from them, and the learned-by-rote beliefs that promote and condone them, have fear as their root cause. Love is the antidote to fear. Real unconditional love is what I mean. The clingy insecure dependency that is often called by the name of love is just fear that is afraid to express itself overtly. Fear cannot exist along with love. Where one exists it crowds out the other, and each of us has the power to choose which one we will accept and express.
Cum dilectione hominum et odio vitiorum.
"With love for mankind and hatred of sins."
St. Augustine. Letter 211 (c. 424)
"Hate the sin and not the sinner"
Mohandas Gandhi
autobiography (1929)
Recent Comments