Month: November 2006

  • Relative Difficulty

    Sometimes life feels like an uphill road.  It’s a matter of
    perspective.  Attitude has a lot to do with it, too.  If I
    allow myself to think in those terms, I start finding myself saying
    things (to myself) like, “It is so hard to…” or “I’m too tired to…”
    or (horror of horrors) “I can’t….”

    I still  haven’t got the knack of keeping my attitude sunny and
    upbeat all the time, and from where I sit now such a denial of the ups
    and downs of reality seems insane.  In the attitude department,
    I’m a whole lot better off than I used to be.  There was a time in
    my life, about forty or fifty years ago, when those defeatist attitudes
    were all I had, besides fantasies.  That’s pathetic, living
    between daydreams of happiness that I believed to be impossible and a
    perceived reality that was uniformly tough and challenging when it
    wasn’t actually more than I felt I could bear.

    Little things sometimes get to me.  A while ago, I missed a call
    from Greyfox because I was in the bathroom, the computer was connected
    to the internet, and CallWave took the message.  Living apart from
    my spouse, I rely on such phone calls for whatever day-to-day
    interaction there is in our relationship.

    Because his cell plan gives him more off-peak minutes than the
    “anytime” ones, we do most of our talking at night and on
    weekends.  Yesterday, Doug had an online D&D session all day,
    and by the time he got offline so that I could get a phone call
    through, I was yawning and so was Greyfox.  It was a brief
    conversation and I don’t recall anything but the yawns.

    We had another conversation this morning when Greyfox called to tell me
    that his cell battery was almost dead.  He was going to put it in
    the charger last night, but it was inaccessible and he didn’t have the
    energy to rearrange his clutter to get to it.  He called to say
    that he was going to find that charger and would be incommunicado until
    this evening.

    Then I walked in and saw the CallWave box showing the number of one of
    the pay phones he often uses when he’s in town.  His message was
    35 seconds long and the sound of his voice made me kick myself because
    there wasn’t really any good reason for the computer to have been left
    online while I went to the bathroom.

    There wasn’t any good reason to disconnect it, either, really, and
    there’s a good chance that the phone’s answering machine would have
    taken that same message if I had disconnected.  I’m a fool for
    beating myself up for missing out on a little common everyday
    pleasure.  Life is full of them, now that I stop and think about
    it.  But stupid, self-defeating habits are hard to break.

    Even before I missed that call today, I had been thinking about degrees
    of difficulty and how the hard times are easier to bear when I don’t
    keep telling myself how hard it is.  Enough already!  I have
    heard it all before.  I know just how difficult it is sometimes,
    to breathe, to move this body from point A to point B, to accomplish a
    simple, complex, or strenuous task.  I know, already.

    Another thing I know:  it’s all a lot easier when I remember the
    attitude secret.  Back when I kept getting in my own way with all
    the pathos and pessimism, in some ways I had it a lot easier than I
    appreciated.  Now that physical tasks are harder, I can use all
    the help I can get, and an optimistic, can-do attitude helps a lot.

  • Confrontational Theater

    A moment ago, Doug stuck his head around the corner and said, “It
    should be possible to rent a megaphone somewhere, shouldn’t it?”

    Immediately, I got the image of the open cone shape of an old megaphone
    like Rudy Vallee sang through and cheerleaders of a past century
    utilized to enable their voices to be heard at the back of the
    stands.  Realizing that wasn’t what Doug wanted to rent, I shook
    off the image and asked, “You mean the electronic bullhorn, don’t you?”

    After he acknowledged my surmise, I asked him what use he might have
    for a bullhorn.  He said he was thinking about calling, “slogans
    from rooftops and introducing some randomness into people’s
    lives.”  Just now he wandered over and read over my shoulder,
    explaining, “It wouldn’t be anything objectionable;  just
    something to make people think.”  Then he laughed and said that to
    some people thinking would be objectionable.

    Earlier, after he had made that “randomness” remark, I had thought for
    a moment before saying, “Confrontational theater… When I was about
    your age, I was doing that.  Riding with the bikers, when we got
    off the bikes and walked the streets, we were doing confrontational
    theater.  We called it ‘freaking the straights,’ or ‘bugging the
    citizens.’”

    That concept of confrontational theater has been occuring to my mind at intervals ever since icepickphil mentioned it to me in an email in connection with the old sTp
    family.  Phil  had found my Xanga through a websearch. 
    Sadly, my reference to the revolutionary communes, the “families” of
    the ‘sixties and early ‘seventies, such as sTp and the Assholes I met
    in Boulder, is one of very few to be found on the web.  It’s a
    part of history that deserves to be more widely known.

    The idea, on those occasions when the “theater” was premeditated and
    not just our spontaneous drug-fueled craziness, was to wake up Joe
    Citizen by putting strangeness right in his face where he couldn’t
    ignore it.  The Merry Pranksters did it to extremes with a
    paisley-painted bus and electric Kool-Aid. 

    The grody young biker “Grace” and I did it in Denny’s, traipsing among
    the tables in black leather as our cohort headed in a pack for the big
    booth in back.  His style was to stop, gain eye contact with a
    diner, point to a half-eaten steak or a pristine pork chop, and ask
    politely, “Are you going to eat that?” as he picked it up.  I
    wouldn’t ask.  I’d just slide by a table and snag a piece of toast
    or handful of fries.  If a half-eaten slice of pie tempted me, I’d
    snag it and pick up a fork from the next table, sometimes right from
    the fingers of the diner there.

    The great beauty of these events was their spontaneity.  The first
    Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test just happened.  Its success engendered
    all the rest.  The first time Grace and Gross (yeah, that’s me)
    grossed out the breakfast crowd at Denny’s, we were on our way home from
    a weekend run and were hungry.  None but the two of us had the
    blood-sugar sensitivity that rendered us incapable of waiting for the
    waitress to take our orders and bring our food.  Walking through
    that restaurant, stoned and starving, he and I picked up a few items
    that had been left behind by departed diners.

    The stunned looks from other patrons and the approbation of our peers
    motivated us not only to repeat the performance, but to embroider on
    it, taking it to ever greater heights of chutzpah.  Within a year
    or so, when a pack of Hells Angels pulled into a Denny’s parking lot,
    the manager would lock the door and call the cops. 

    Accustomed to being rousted wherever we went, it was rare for anyone to
    be carrying contraband substances or armament.  We’d be milling
    around innocently by the door and windows, shading our eyes as we
    peered in at the bewildered customers and anxious staff.  One time
    the cops compelled a couple of bikers to tear decorative patches from
    their clothing because their messages were obscene, but to the best of
    my recollection that’s the most severe penalty any of us ever suffered
    for our misdemeanors. Eventually, we’d stop at Denny’s for effect, even
    if we didn’t want to eat.  Everyone I knew thought that the
    entertainment value made it worth the inconvenience.  We’d pile
    back on the bikes, roar out of the parking lot, and if we were hungry
    we’d pull in at the next available eatery.

    Our subculture in that Vietnam war era was as fragmented and disparate
    as the mainstream culture then and now. Some hippies were facing down
    National Guard troops with flowers, while other kids with the same
    clothing and hairstyles were building bombs to blow up the National
    Guard armories.   The “official” Hells Angels position was
    adamantly anti-drug (except for alcohol), and some Angels I knew were
    making weekend runs to Mexico to bring back commercial quantities of
    big fat white-cross benzedrine tabs.  But one thing that the
    flower children, bikers, speed-freaks and violent revolutionaries had
    in common was their theatricality, putting on a show for the bystanding
    citizens and the media.

    This idea of confrontational theater had been percolating through my
    brain for weeks when it caromed off some other memories from that era
    and met up with something I’d absorbed from recent events.  
    That other stray memory from the late sixties was a chance meeting, in
    the course of a drug deal, with some student militants.  It came
    up in the course of conversation that they were planning an assault on
    the ROTC building on campus.  It went like this:

    student:  Yeah, this is pretty good stuff.  How much you got?
    my companion:  [irrelevant commercial details]
    Then after a pause in the conversation for further appreciation of the quality of the drugs,
    student:  Hey, man, we’ve been having this argument, see. 
    Whadda you think, is terrorism a legitimate tool for social change?

    The discussion was a common one at the time.  Ulrike Meinhof
    was a cultural icon to most of those in our subculture who had heard of
    her, and just a common criminal, a smart girl gone bad, to most of the
    mainstream who had heard of her.  There were more people in both
    camps who had never heard of her than you might think.  Terrorism
    was something that happened in Europe, Asia and Africa, not here. 
    Thus, we could sit around, get stoned, and discuss whether it was worth
    taking a few innocent lives to get the attention of the entrenched
    power structure and bring about a more egalitarian setup.

    Finally, it has occurred to me that terrorism is a form of
    confrontational theater.  I thought briefly about calling it the
    ultimate form of confrontational theater but, sure enough, if I say
    that, some newer and bigger form would come along and prove me wrong.

     
     

  • Beautiful Photoblog NOT

    This morning as the sun rose I stood with my back to the woodstove
    drinking coffee, and watched through the hazy plastic sheeting over the
    east window as the warm-colored glow turned from deep red-orange
    through brilliant coral to soft peach.  Now it is mostly gray,
    with just a hint of pink.  I know that the warmth of that glow was
    far away, about 93 million miles, it seems.  The outdoor temp this
    morning is about minus four and the indoor temp about fifty thanks to
    Doug’s all-night efforts to keep the woodstove full and hot.

    When I caught my first glimpse of the color this morning, I thought
    about grabbing the camera and rushing out there to catch the light
    before it faded.  I looked down at my sheepskin slippers, and over
    to the single sno-jog I’ve been able to find, and opted to stay where I
    was.  A bit later, as the color not only lasted but intensified, I
    felt a twinge of guilt for not hopping to it.

    I dismissed that feeling immediately.  I have been hopping to far
    too many and too strenuous tasks lately.  The fibromyalgia
    self-management course in which I enrolled as a test subject counsels
    that we be only as active as we can be without increasing our pain and
    fatigue.  It is a hard line to discern until I have already passed
    it, and I have been passing it quite consistently lately.  This
    self-destructive behavior has to stop.

    I’ll do some more poking around in the clutter and try today to
    discover where the cats hid my other old sno jog.  I know where
    the newer pair is, but they are not appropriate for a quick dash out
    the door with the camera.  The old ones are creased, cracked,
    stretched-out and loose, with that extra space filled by two pairs of
    felt innersoles to insulate the bottoms of my feet.  The new ones
    are town shoes, trim and uncreased, and have no room for extra
    insulation.

    So that’s my plan for today:  find a boot.  Go ahead and laugh, but it is a bigger job than you might think, and I don’t have a lot of available energy to use.

  • Another Tedious Philosophical/Metaphysical Post

    You don’t need to read this.  I need to write it.  If it’s
    over your head or beneath your notice, and you’d prefer the sort of
    superficial weather reports and personal daily diary posts you’ve been
    getting from me lately, just scroll down to the bottom.


    In response to

    yesterday’s political rant, I received a wish for, “…a heart at

    peace, and love for the whole world.”  I suppose that indicates

    the difficulties of, first, always accurately conveying what I’m

    thinking and feeling, and, also, having what I say received and

    understood without being filtered and distorted by the consciousnesses

    of my readers.  I’m thinking that a perfect accomplishment of both

    of those ambitions is probably impossible as long as the medium of

    communication is words, but that won’t stop me from trying to get as

    close to the ideal as I can.

    As I read those words, “a heart at peace, and love for the whole

    world,” I paused in reflection for a moment, a little systems check,

    and confirmed that indeed I do have a heart at peace, and I  feel universal

    unconditional love.  That’s not exactly what the writer wished for

    me; the Universe is greater than this one little planetary “world,” but

    I think I come close enough.  Should I thank the writer for the

    wish, maybe, on the theory that it came true and caused my elevated

    state of consciousness?  Hell no, friends!   Although I cannot honestly

    say I reached that state without a lot of help, I certainly have been

    there long before that wish ever occurred to that writer.

    Love, as I have said here many times before, is a troublesome and
    questionable word.   It means so many things to various
    people that it is, in effect, meaningless unless it is defined for any
    given instance.  My love for the beings of this Universe is not
    erotic, not the dependent, clinging and expectant “love” of a child for
    a parent.  There is no way in which my universal unconditional
    love can be expressed as a need or desire.  It didn’t happen to me
    – I didn’t just fall into it or have it dropped into my lap.  I
    made the choice to love, and I have frequently made the same choice
    every time I have been confronted with a personal dilemma or
    interpersonal conflict.  When I am in doubt about the correct
    course of action, I ask myself, “What would Love do?”

    I don’t judge my fellow beings.  When a four-legged animal’s
    behavior becomes a bother or a threat to me and mine, I take action to
    evict it from my space or eliminate the threat.  I don’t blame
    cats for acting feline or dogs for doing what dogs naturally do. 
    I don’t go out and track down bears, wolves, moose or other critters to
    interfere with them, nor do I interfere with their peaceful
    co-existence in my neighborhood and yard.  To some extent, my
    behavior toward my fellow domestic primates (the hairless apes) follows
    the same rules.

    I love them all.  It’s not the airy-fairy, warm and fuzzy,
    nurturing, I-want-to-buy-the-world-a-Coke, feeling that I’ve heard some
    people express.  It is, at its base, simply a certainty that we
    are all One.  I love them as I love myself, and that’s where I run
    up against the disapproval of some of my fellow beings.  I accept
    myself wholly and unconditionally, and I am scrupulous in continually
    checking and correcting my behavior.  In my Universal love for all
    my fellows, I am equally scrupulous about freely checking and
    correcting their behavior.  Greyfox kids around at Twelve-Step
    meetings by saying that I do a perfect Tenth Step:  when he is
    wrong, I promptly admit it.

    Not that I would ever act to
    keep anyone from engaging in a behavior that wasn’t harming me or
    mine.  I’m actually fairly laissez faire, even in matters such as
    second-hand smoke.  Nobody smokes in my house, but I don’t take
    any action to stop people from smoking on their own turf.  I’ll
    speak up sometimes, and say that I’m allergic to tobacco, but more
    often I am likely to just leave the smoky place.  It depends
    entirely on the situation.  If I choose to leave, it’s not in
    anger but in self-preservation, but people don’t always perceive it
    that way.  If I reveal my allergy, it is not with any expectation
    of special treatment, but that is also frequently misunderstood.

    Our cultural programming makes it difficult for some people to
    understand that I can accept and approve of them unconditionally, while
    not accepting or approving of all their behavior.  It is a very
    old idea, a “love the sinner, hate the sin,” thing, although I don’t
    tend to think in terms of sin and sinners.  I simply draw a
    distinction between beings and their behavior.   As I have
    stated emphatically many times, notably in my Emotional Self-Control Tool Kit
    post, one of my life’s ruling injunctions is, “Do nothing to damage
    your self-esteem.”  Unfortunately for the complacency,
    self-delusion and denial of some people, my self-esteem demands that I
    speak up and say what I see when I see someone behaving in a
    destructive, imprudent, fear-driven or foolish manner.  I don’t
    resort to ad hominem insults, but too many people take my criticism of
    their behavior as if it were a judgement on them.

    There is one very important way in which I choose not to treat other
    people as I treat myself.  I go easy on everyone but me.  I
    demand higher standards of behavior from me that from you.  I
    recognize that not everyone has had my advantages, hasn’t encountered
    the same excellent teachers I have (perhaps because they were not ready
    for them?).  I know that most people are culture-bound and either
    willingly or unwillingly misled.  I accept that as a fact, but not
    as something that needs to remain so.  I endeavor always to
    comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable.


    The sun is up and it is beginning
    to warm up.  It is up to three degrees above zero Fahrenheit
    now.  I overdid yesterday, taping the poly sheeting over the big
    front window while Doug was asleep.  That job had been on hold for
    a few days because I wanted to have him around for ground support to
    save me all the climbing up and down, but each day when he awoke I had
    been already too fatigued to tackle the job.

    I started it in the morning while I was still fresh, and before it was
    half done — plants moved out of the way, book shelves cleared so I
    could reach behind them, plastic sheet positioned and “tacked” in place
    at corners with strips of duct tape, and the first few long strips of
    duct tape applied to seal down the edges — I was saying to myself, “I
    should stop.  I need to take a break.”  My stubborn self
    wanted to get it done, so I didn’t stop until I couldn’t climb back up
    on the bed after one of my descents.

    Finally, I did stop for a break and bit by bit got the plants hung back
    on their hooks in the half of the window that I’d gotten sealed. 
    When Doug awoke yesterday afternoon, he moved a few plants away from
    the end I hadn’t done, taped down those edges, and replaced those
    plants.  This morning before he went to bed the two of us sealed
    the bathroom window and taped a square of poly sheet over the exhaust
    fan hole in the ceiling, the single worst heat leak in the whole place,
    except for the front door, which the cats can open, but which they
    never bother to completely close.  Thanks be to gravity and an
    off-plumb trailer that the door does swing back into contact with the
    frame after they pass through. 

    I was so cold in here yesterday that for a few hours I stretched bungee
    cords across the door and restricted feline access.  The bungees
    are still hanging there from the time a couple of winters back when I
    thought it would be prudent to have some way to deter or at least
    discourage a bear from just leaning on the door, swinging it open, and
    walking in.  That was right after Doug shot the moose, when there
    was still blood and guts on the snow in the yard, and I was wary of
    bears.  How the door came to be not only unlockable, but without
    even a functioning latch, is one I’ve told before, but I neglected to
    record the link to that story.

  • Political Satire

    It seems to me that it gets harder and harder to parody politics, now
    that the politicians appear to be creating their own satire.  The
    silliest thing about it all is that they have every appearance of being
    serious about it.

    A couple of years ago, jibjab.com generated half a million (daily?) web
    hits and a little flurry of litigation with their “This Land” joke
    video, in which Bush called Kerry a liberal sissy and Kerry called Prez
    Shrub a right-wing nut job.

    This week Kerry, speaking to a group of students, recommended that they
    attend to their schooling or get, “stuck in Iraq.”  The White
    House’s spin machine jumped on it, called it an insult to our troops,
    and demanded an apology.

    I think Kerry only compounded the gaffe by saying it was a “botched
    joke” on Bush.  Is it a slur on the troops to truthfully suggest
    that many of them got there because of their limited career choices
    with a less than sterling educational background?  Couldn’t he
    have found some statistics to support his statement?  Maybe he is
    a sissy.

    Is the administration really trying to deny that a substantial portion
    of their all-volunteer army accepted that path as an alternative to
    incarceration, or for the promise of vocational training that the
    recruiters offered? 

    Here in this Alaskan valley, I know several young men who went into the
    military because they lacked either the tuition or the grades to get
    into college and couldn’t find lawful employment around here. 
    Some of the ones who didn’t go that route are now operating meth labs,
    growing bud, or sitting in jail.

    At one end of the military system, we have recruiters cheating, forging
    and faking records in order to squeeze in some unqualified recruits,
    while the Commander in Chief is up there at the other end boasting
    about how “smart” his cannon fodder is.

    They are not necessarily stupid because they grasped onto one of the
    few promises of economic survival they were offered, but their current
    predicament suggests that they might have lacked forethought, or the
    foresight they could have gained from a closer study of history and
    current events.

    Here in my home state, the families of a National Guard unit are making
    a lot of noise over the fact that their service men and women have had
    their Iraq deployments extended.  I have heard some sound bites
    from those very same National Guard troops, back when they were
    originally about to be deployed, saying that when they joined the
    Guard, they never expected to go to war.

    Were they lied to by recruiters?  Did they fail to read the
    contract they signed?  Were they listening to what they were
    parroting when they were sworn in?  Was their education so
    deficient that they never quite caught onto the connection between the
    military and war?

    I’ll cut them this slack:  they are young.  I’m not.  I
    am a lifelong student of history and current events.  I was born
    during a war — World War TWO, the next big war that came after the
    Great War to End All Wars.  I grew up amid men of my father’s
    generation with hooks for hands and psychological quirks that people
    called “shell shock” behind their backs.

    A major formative event of my youth was the Vietnam “conflict”, an
    undeclared war against which my subcultural cohort protested. 
    From that war many of my current friends returned minus a few body
    parts.  The addictions they acquired in that jungle still plague
    them.  Many of them are certified nut jobs, in and out of jail for
    their violent outbursts.  Even the ones that don’t have it that
    bad carry psychic scars that still cause them nightmares. 

    This deplorable debacle in Iraq is to me just another war, caused by
    just a different set of madmen, flexing their muscles, trying to prove
    their manhood, outdo their fathers, and make their fortunes all at the
    same time.  I am offended by Bush’s calling his troops “smart”
    while using them this way, putting them in harm’s way.  Just
    saying something doesn’t make it so, dammit!