Month: February 2006

  • MATING RITUALS IN THE CYBERNETIC AGE

    It’s Valentines Day.  This morning I heard a giggle-inducing bit
    on NPR’s Morning Edition, where Steve Inskeep and Renee Montagne read
    several ads targeted toward the occasion and trying to sell things as
    diverse as furnaces and laser hair removal.  Long live romance…
    long live commerce.

    In New Mexico, it is Extraterrestrial Culture Day, the second Tuesday
    in February, just happening this year to coincide with Valentines
    Day.  I don’t know what Daniel Foley, the state representative
    from Roswell, had in mind when he proposed the memorial four years
    ago.  I imagine there was an element of tongue-in-cheek humor in
    it, as well as some commercially motivated civic boosterism.  I
    don’t really care why he did it.  I simply appreciate the
    opportunity to consider and discuss ET culture.

    I think it would have been more appropriate to have made it ET Cultures
    Day, because there must be more than one distinct culture out
    there.  Even among the Grays that we know who have visited us
    there is cultural diversity.  There are the somewhat primitive
    Grays, the ones with the beady little eyes, who messily investigated
    the interior anatomy of cattle and invasively used a few humans for
    their genetic experiments.  Then there are the more highly evolved
    ones with the big wraparound eyes who are trying to help preserve our
    ecology.  But I digress….

    I have been reflecting on the Xangan youths who have been posting
    photographs of their genitals.  I suppose it had to come to
    this.  I wonder what Gregory Bateson would think of it, what
    Desmond Morris’s take on it is, and what Marshall McLuhan would have to say.

    Often I wonder what Gregory Bateson
    would think of one thing or another, because he had a gift for seeing
    aspects and ramifications of things that might escape many
    people.  In the 1960s, when I found his writings for the first
    time, they excited me because he challenged me to run to a dictionary
    and expand my vocabulary so that I could understand the words with
    which he informed my vision and expanded my mind.

    Gregory was a twentieth-century Renaissance man: an anthropologist,
    psychologist, cybernetic theorist, ecologist, etiologist, social
    scientist, ethnographer, biologist… a limitless thinker with a
    holistic perspective.  He coined the word, “cybernetics”, for the
    then-new science of computers.  I am sure he would be interested
    in the way our culture has evolved to incoroporate these machines, and
    I imagine that he would be amused by some of the effects.

    Desmond
    Morris is a zoologist and anthropologist whose specialty is sex: 
    mating behavior and the behavioral differences between sexes.  He
    said, “Biologically speaking, if something bites you it’s more likely
    to be female,” and, “…the city is not a concrete jungle, it’s a human
    zoo.” 

    His book, The Naked Ape,
    published October 12, 1967, described many social and cultural
    practices in zoological terms.  He pointed out, for example, how
    cosmetic enhancements such as lipstick mimic the effects of sexual
    arousal.  I’d bet he also took note eventually of the use of
    collagen injections to emphasize that cosmetic effect.

    He identified twelve steps which Western couples pass
    through on the way to sexual intimacy. Occasionally a step may be left
    out, but they almost always occur in this order:

        1. Eye to body
        2. Eye to eye
        3. Voice to voice
        4. Hand to hand
        5. Arm to shoulder
        6. Arm to waist
        7. Mouth to mouth
        8. Hand to head
        9. Hand to body
        10. Mouth to breast
        11. Hand to genitals
        12. Genitals to genitals

    With adolescents now tending to gather online more than they do at
    the
    mall or malt shops, it makes sense that they are passing through the
    first three steps to mating electronically.  Showing off one’s
    body on a blog seems to me to be much healthier and safer than doing it
    in the smoky, alcohol-soaked meat-market singles bars frequented by the
    generation of these young people’s parents.

    Marshall
    McLuhan was a social scientist who specialized in exploring and
    speculating on the effects of technology on culture.  He had a
    real way with words, was a master of the one-liner, the succinct sound bite.  He said, “The medium is the message.” 
    He said, “The future is our permanent address;” and, “If it works, it’s
    obsolete.”

    It wouldn’t surprise me to learn that he had foreseen
    the way the web has influenced mating behavior.  He might point
    out the layers of safety, the “comfort zone” provided by the distance
    the web imposes between participants.  He would also surely make
    note of the prevalent attitude of skepticism engendered in those who
    understand that the fourteen-year-old girl they’re eye-emming might
    very well be a middle aged man.

    Just because I found them and want to share them, here are a few more McLuhanisms:

    The story of modern America begins with the discovery of the white man by the Indians.

    Only puny secrets need protection. Big discoveries are protected by public incredulity.

    The nature of people demands that most of them be engaged in the most frivolous possible activities—like making money.

    With telephone and TV it is not so much the message as the sender that is “sent.”

    Money is the poor man’s credit card.

    We look at the present through a rear-view mirror. We march backwards into the future.

    You mean my whole fallacy’s wrong?

    Why is it so easy to acquire the solutions of past problems and so difficult to solve current ones?

    The trouble with a cheap, specialized education is that you never stop paying for it.

    The price of eternal vigilance is indifference.

    When you are on the phone or on the air, you have no body.

    This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.

    The specialist is one who never makes small mistakes while moving toward the grand fallacy.

    One of the nicest things about being big is the luxury of thinking little.

    Politics offers yesterday’s answers to today’s questions.

    In big industry new ideas are invited to rear their heads so they can
    be clobbered at once. The idea department of a big firm is a sort of
    lab for isolating dangerous viruses.

    Food for the mind is like food for the body: the inputs are never the same as the outputs.

    Men on frontiers, whether of time or space, abandon their previous
    identities. Neighborhood gives identity. Frontiers snatch it away.

    A road is a flattened-out wheel, rolled up in the belly of an airplane.

    More can be found here.

  • Xanga Terms of Use

    Mrs. Grundy, in the guise of some Xangans who consider themselves grownups and who act like vigilantes,
    is up in arms about violations of Xanga’s Terms of Use.  Anyone
    who registers for a blogsite here promises to abide by those
    terms.  Few people read them, I’ve been told.  I read them
    and took them seriously when I first came here.  I was a newbie on
    the web at the time, and had not yet been initiated to the practice of
    either checking the box without looking at the fine print or scrolling
    through the terms of service rapidly, picking out the occasional
    outstanding word for its comic effect.

    I felt severely limited by the constraints laid out in the Terms of
    Use.  When I started posting episodes of my memoirs, I mentioned
    my fear that a truthful telling of my story would get my site shut
    down.  Everyone who commented assured me that I was unlikely to be
    shut down for vulgarity or obscenity.  Some of them cited examples
    of well-known and generally loved Xangans who were routinely vulgar
    and/or obscene in their posts.  Some people included links to
    examples.  There were several veiled and ambiguous references to
    the elusive and mythical Bianca.  The consensus was that only the
    most blatant, egregious and extreme violations would receive any
    response from admin.

    This may or may not still be the reality around here.  As I see
    it, whether Xanga admin responds to the Grundian pleas to shut down
    “pornographic” sites depends on several factors, regarding none of
    which I have enough data to be able to predict admin’s response. 
    I don’t, for example, know whether the Xanga Team, which consists
    largely of young men, will define “pornography” by the same criteria as
    Mrs. Grundy does.  Nor do I know whether Xanga has adequate
    personnel to police its multitude of sites to Mrs. Grundy’s
    satisfaction in a timely manner. 

    These unknown factors do not even address other factors such as the
    ease with which the owner of a shut-down site can register for a new one
    under a different name and email address, or the slippery, ambiguous
    and highly open-to-interpretation nature of the Terms themselves. 
    Having read and reread the terms several times, I am inclined to
    dismiss much of the whole mess as bullshit
    – ooops! That was vulgar,
    wasn’t it?  “Vulgar” is not allowed here. What I meant was that
    the Terms of Use strike me as being partially PR pap and the rest
    hypocritical CYA or legal boilerplate.

    Here, let me show you what I mean:

    Xanga’s Terms of Use is designed primarily to protect our members[I don't think so.  It is, as it must be, designed primarily to protect the site's owner(s)]  To help maintain a safe and fun environment at Xanga, you must agree not to use Xanga’s products or services to:

        * upload, post, email or otherwise transmit any Content that is unlawful,
    harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar,
    obscene, libelous, invasive of another’s privacy, hateful, or racially,
    ethnically or otherwise objectionable;


        * harm minors in any way;  [This
    is broad enough to cover just about any possible legal liability, and
    too broad to make sense as a useful guideline in the real world. 
    Some of those words are so broadly open to interpretation as to be
    meaningless, especially the last two.]

        * impersonate any person or entity, including, but
    not limited to, a Xanga official, or falsely state or otherwise
    misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity;
        * forge headers or otherwise manipulate identifiers
    in order to disguise the origin of any Content transmitted through the
    Service;
        * upload, post, email or otherwise transmit any Content
    that you do not have a right to transmit under any law or under
    contractual or fiduciary relationships (such as inside information,
    proprietary and confidential information learned or disclosed as part
    of employment relationships or under nondisclosure agreements);


        * upload, post, email or otherwise transmit any Content that infringes any patent, trademark, trade secret, copyright or other proprietary rights (“Rights”) of any party;

        * upload, post,
    email or otherwise transmit any unsolicited or unauthorized
    advertising, promotional materials, “junk mail,” “spam,” “chain
    letters,” “pyramid schemes,” or any other form of solicitation, except
    in those areas (such as shopping rooms) that are designated for such
    purpose;


        * upload, post,
    email or otherwise transmit any material that contains software viruses
    or any other computer code, files or programs designed to interrupt,
    destroy or limit the functionality of any computer software or hardware
    or telecommunications equipment;


        * “stalk” or otherwise harass another; or

        * collect or store personal data about other users. [This covers those liabilities not covered above.]

    You acknowledge that Xanga does not pre-screen Content, but that Xanga and its designees shall have the right (but not the obligation) in their sole discretion to refuse or remove any Content that violates this Agreement or is otherwise objectionable.  [In other words, the Xanga Gods rule.]


    You understand that all Content
    posted to the Xanga system or otherwise transmitted via the Service is
    the sole responsiblity of the individual who originally posted the
    Content. You agree that Xanga will not be liable, under any
    circumstances and in any way, for any errors or omissions, loss or
    damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of any Content
    posted or otherwise transmitted via the Service. You agree that You
    must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with the use of any
    Content, including any reliance on the accuracy, completeness, or
    usefulness of such Content.  [the ultimate CYA]

    It
    was pointed out to me that the members of the vigilante blogring that
    was formed to address the “pornograpy problem” have been conducting
    their business in protected posts.  My informant likened this
    activity to that of various secret police organizations.  Their
    tactics are similar, yes, but their status is unofficial, which is why
    I term them vigilantes.  Someone else likened these people to the
    KKK, perhaps the best-known of all the vigilantist American secret
    societies.  I do not doubt that these people would, if they had
    the power to do so, shut down the sites they find offensive. 
    Lacking that power, they content themselves with informing to an
    administration that may or may not appreciate their efforts or share
    their views.

    One of the most debatable aspects of this hoohaw is what these vigilantes mean when they say, “pornography”.  Dictionary definitions refer to the intent of the material being published, rather than to its content,
    making it quite difficult to pin down.  Pornography is a
    layperson’s word, anyway, without legal meaning.   The laws
    governing “pornography” deal with the concept of obscenity.   In the entries I read through the links posted under the “censorship
    challenge, I saw references to nudity and to depictions of
    genitalia.  Nobody whose posts I read referred directly to any
    depictions of overt sexual acts.  The sites so offensive to them,
    they said, were ones where the site’s owners were displaying their own
    genitalia.

    Some of the participants in this crusade are trumpeting the necessity
    of protecting “children” from themselves.  This troubles me as much as
    I am troubled by the general lack of civil rights among the young. 
    Although I know that as a member of this culture I am stuck with it, I
    do not agree with the implication of the term, “minor child,” as
    generally defined.  De jure, yes, adolescents who are sexually mature
    and often sexually active are still “minor children” after they have
    become de facto adults.  It is hard for me to think of people as
    children when they are obviously sexually mature and are quite
    blatantly displaying their mature bodies and seeking mates.

    Here is what the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on “obscenity.”

    In the 1973 case Miller v. California,
    the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed an earlier ruling that obscenity was
    not protected speech under the First Amendment and could therefore be
    prohibited. Further, the Court laid down a standard by which all future
    obscenity cases would be judged. Representing the majority opinion,
    Chief Justice Warren Burger wrote:

        The basic guidelines for the trier of fact must be:

              (a) whether “the
    average person, applying contemporary community standards” would find
    the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest…,
              (b) whether the
    work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct
    specifically defined by the applicable state law, and
              (c) whether the
    work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or
    scientific value.

    The ruling further instructed that the standard to be used was that of
    the community in which the case was being tried and that no national
    standard was needed.

    Guidelines (a) and (b) would, for me and many other Americans, both
    Xangans and non-Xangans, exempt any and all simple depictions of nude
    anatomy from classification as “obscenity.”  Unlike Mrs. Grundy, I
    see nothing pornographic or obscene in a plain picture of
    genitalia.  Now all that remains to be determined is whether the
    “community standards” are those of the Xangan community or its
    administration.  If we were allowed a democratic vote on the
    issue, I suspect that Mrs. Grundy would be shut down.

    The aspect of this matter that I find most troubling is the fear that
    is so obviously motivating Mrs. Grundy, and the hostile reaction
    stirred up among the young people she is trying to suppress. 
    Having made the conscious
    choice to turn my life over to Love and to try in all things to be
    motivated by Love rather than fear, I cannot even imagine my
    participating
    in this ill-conceived crusade against young persons whose minds and
    souls have not been so programmed with fear of biology and loathing for
    the naked human form.  Nor can I participate in the angry uproar
    of
    retaliation.  I can, and do, sympathize with the oppressed and
    pity the
    oppressors for the fear that oppresses them.

  • MISCONCEPTIONS, MISPERCEPTIONS, MISINFORMATION… AND SOME NEWS

    I still haven’t worked myself up sufficiently to adequately respond to the latest Featured_Grownups
    “challenge”, to write about Xanga’s terms of use.  After having
    been so thoroughly misinformed that the topic was “censorship”, and
    having responded to a non-existent “discussion” — and initiating a
    pair of new discussions, on censorship and vigilantism — I do want to
    get a piece of my mind into the TOS fray, and will do so if this
    flighty mind of mine cooperates before the thing goes entirely stale
    for everyone.


    My meandering piece last night, written as intro to Greyfox’s entry about  his mother dying, drew this pair of comments:

    When
    most people say that they don’t believe in life after death, I usually
    thought that they meant that there is nothing at all after one
    dies—no spirit continuing on or hanging around.  Yet your post
    clarifies for me that for some other people, “no life after death”
    means that there will be no life again in the the physical body that we
    used in this life
    merrow_mistral

    They are both correct, really.  I suppose I did imply the
    inference that mistral drew.  The idea that a decomposed corpse
    will be reanimated seems to me to be not just absurd but
    horrifying.  I certainly meant that belief is not the same as knowledge
    I so frequently repeat myself and restate things I’ve said before, that
    I often just allude to some of them as I did there without further
    explanation.  Anyone who hasn’t read any of my rants on belief
    versus knowledge might not get it.

    I will say it again:  we have no need to believe in anything that we know
    Belief is for the things we don’t know but that we either hope or fear
    are true, or which we have heard or read so often that unless we
    question, investigate and experiment, they seem to be true.  The
    less we believe, the better off we are.


    Somehow, Greyfox’s series of
    phone calls about  his mother’s impending death reminded me of
    when I got the news that my mother had died.

    It was a call from the Alaska State Troopers.  As long as I have
    been in Alaska, and probably since there have been State Troopers here,
    they have acted as messengers for “emergency” messages.  I suppose
    that the particular dispatcher involved determines the definition of
    “emergency,” because it was a call from a sympathetic female trooper
    that connected me with Angie
    after her investigator had found a reference to my living in Alaska in
    my mother’s obituary.  It was in no way an emergency, but that
    woman was so intrigued and inspired by the story of a woman searching
    for her birth mother that she bent the rules, connected us, and even
    called me back later in the day to find out how it had gone.

    The call that told me my mother had died was more in line with the
    usual type of calls the troopers make.  For people who live in
    remote areas, they might deliver the message by radio, aircraft,
    snowmobile, or boat.  When I got home from having worked two weeks
    in our food booth at the state fair, there was a note on my door, to
    call the troopers for an emergency message.  I did, and was told
    that my mother had died more than a week before I got the message.

    They had no information for me on who had made the call to them. 
    I started trying to call relatives for more information.  The
    first one I reached was my eldest daughter Dorrie.  She said that
    she had made that call to the troopers, four days before my mother
    died, and told them that she was dying.  Knowing about it then
    wouldn’t have done any good.  I couldn’t have flown to her side
    and even if I had it wouldn’t have changed a thing. 

    It took me some time to get closure regarding my mother’s death. 
    I had a series of dreams in which I was trying to call her but couldn’t
    remember her phone number.  That may have been about more than her
    death, actually.  Even when we were in the same room, Mama and I
    didn’t really connect most of the time.


    NEWS

    Did the pipeline dodge the latest bullet? 

    Some years ago, a drunken man shot up the Trans-Alaska Pipeline, caused
    some minor damage and a small oil spill, and got in a heap of trouble
    over it.

    Now there’s news of a Wilkes-Barre, PA man, arrested in Idaho late last
    year, who allegedly had plans to detonate trucks filled with propane
    along our pipeline, along with blowing up a big oil refinery in the
    east, another in the west, and the Transcontinental (natural gas)
    Pipeline running from the Gulf Coast to the Atlantic Coast.

    Michael Curtis Williams claims that he is a patriot who was trying to
    uncover an al Qaeda cell in the U.S.  He was busted in December in
    a sting operation initiated after Judge Shannen Rossmiller from Conrad,
    MT, scanning a terrorist website, found Williams’s request for funding
    to buy the trucks to fullfill his plan.  He is being held for
    possession of one hand grenade.
    ———————–
    Latest news from the Yukon Quest
    has Lance Mackey, Hans Gatt and Hugh Neff, “moving around” after a rest
    at the Mile 101 dog drop, between Angel Creek and Central, the first
    two checkpoints on the thousand mile sled dog race (not dog sled
    race:  it’s the first nose over the finish line that wins),
    looking as if they’re getting ready for the run up to Eagle
    Summit.  Weather reports say a snowstorm with high winds is moving
    in, expected to hit Eagle Summit before dark today.
    ———————–
    At Felony Flats this morning, my favorite mungo (a dumpster diver, scrounger or salvager), Greyfox, found a dumpster full of primo mongo
    (stuff worth keeping that has been thrown away).  In an excited
    phone call earlier he said he’d gotten a lot of bedding, throw rugs,
    and sixty hours of old-time radio on twenty cassette tapes, and was on
    his way to back his car up to the dumpster again for another
    load.  As I have been composing this entry, he left two more
    messages on the CallWave, so excited, telling me to call for an update
    as soon as it’s convenient.  That’s what I’m going to do next,
    after I get something to eat.
     

  • Death and Family Dynamics

    My husband Greyfox, to whom I often affectionately refer as the Old

    Fart because that is how he often refers to himself and he’d rather be

    called that than “asshole”, is a shaman.  Just because I show
    him

    no deference, it shouldn’t be taken as a sign I don’t respect

    him.  He has earned a great deal of respect in my eyes through
    his

    success over the past two and three-quarters years at transcending

    multiple addictions and getting a fairly good handle on his

    narcissistic personality disorder.  Few men of his age would
    even

    consider it possible or worth the effort to try to do what he has been

    doing, much less be so successful at it.

    But I digress….

    He’s a shaman.  In case you’re not familiar with any shamans,
    they

    do much of their work on the Other Side, in the shamanic

    Otherworld.  One of their functions is to confer with
    spirits,

    both the ascended and helpful kind and the confused, lost, disembodied

    spirits of those who don’t know they are dead or can’t figure out
    where

    to go once their body stops moving.

    Experiences of that sort tend to give one a different perspective on

    life and death than that held by the cultural mainstream around

    here.  Add to that the fact that the man has vivid memories
    of

    having lived (and died) in bodies other than the one he now inhabits,

    and the fact that he and I and a few of our friends have been around

    together a few times, share common memories and can reminisce about

    combat and carousal in the Roman Legions or the height of the culture

    at Teotihuacan and its fall, and you have a person with an unusual
    view

    of death and dying.

    We (and I don’t hesitate to speak for him on this because it is a
    topic

    on which he often speaks to me at length and with great vehemence) do

    not believe in
    life after death.  We know

    from experience that death is something that happens to the body, not

    the spirit.  Neither of us is sentimental about mortal

    remains.  Our reactions range from bemused to appalled at the

    lengths to which some people will go to glorify, preserve, or recover

    from some remote death-site, a decaying corpse.  Greyfox’s

    somewhat contemptuous blanket term for such practices is, “corpse

    worship.”

    Dying can be traumatic, when it doesn’t happen quickly or
    easily. 

    Life, as nobody is likely to deny, is often traumatic, painful, and

    stressful.  Death itself, in such cases, can be release and

    relief.  We often miss people when they are no longer in our

    lives, but it would be hypocritical for us to express any grief over

    their transition into spirit, especially when their lives had been
    long

    and fulfilling and/or had grown difficult and painful. 

    Interactions with our friends and family can be difficult when they
    are

    of the common mainstream mindset and we are coming from this different

    point of view.

    …awww, rats.  I could go on an on, but it won’t be as
    informative as it would be if you just go and read the post
    Greyfox wrote
    this afternoon at the library and asked me to
    proofread and post for him this evening.

  • Weather Report

    There’s a double or triple entendre in my title here.  I don’t
    always point out the double entendres, though I use them often.  I
    never explain them, so go figure for yourself.  Just remember that I was spang in the middle of the 1960s.

    I am glad I had that impulse yesterday to write my essay on censorship
    before I read the entries that had started the discussion.  If I
    had seen what those people’s knickers were all knotted up about, my
    piece would not have been the pure take on suppression of expression
    that it became.

    The actual discussion was, and apparently still remains (despite some
    justified charges of “beating a dead horse”), a multi-faceted affair
    about flagrant violations of Xanga’s terms of use.  In comments, I
    introduced the term, “vigilantism”, into the discussion (but not the
    concept represented by that word – it was there from the start). 
    At least one person is at least pretending not to understand what I
    mean by that. 

    I will have to return soon to this horse’s twitching corpse to get in a
    few more licks.  I think I may take some notes as I ruminate on it
    today, and perhaps outline my follow-up.  The “discussion” is
    complex, and unless I organize my thoughts I will surely fail to get
    them all down on the page.  Again, I suppose I need to avoid
    reading any more of the entries than I already have, lest that further
    confuse the issue for me.

    Right now is not a good time, or I would begin writing that essay
    now.  I have a limited time at the keyboard while Doug is hauling
    in firewood and walking out to the mailbox.  I’ll have the
    computer to myself after he goes to bed this evening.  Our
    separate schedules have revolved around to where I’m now on the swing
    shift and he’s getting up in the middle of the night.

    Weather in my part of the world is big news locally, even though it
    isn’t at all severe right here in the neighborhood.  We’re about
    100 miles out of Anchorage on the highway that extends into the
    interior, to Fairbanks.  There is one other highway out of
    Anchorage.  It runs the other direction, down the Kenai Peninsula
    to Seward on the coast. 

    That other highway was closed yesterday from about 30 or 40 miles out
    of Anchorage to Cooper Landing, which is on the other side of Turnagain
    Pass.  There had been two avalanches that blocked the
    highway.  Some people who had been trapped inside their car by one
    of the avalanches were rescued and the road closure was supposed to
    have ended at noon today.

    This morning, the state announced that the road closure was extended
    until 6:00 this evening.  State Troopers said that the snow was
    falling at a rate of two inches every fifteen minutes at Mile 44 of the
    Seward Highway.  If that continues, I’d be surprised if the road
    opens then.  The plows couldn’t keep up with it.

    Closer to home, in the lower parts of this valley we live in, the roads
    are icy.  Greyfox reported yesterday that his car was losing
    traction and fish-tailing even in four-wheel drive on a
    straightaway.  This morning, he said it’s no better.  I
    haven’t been out on the highway here, but I’m assuming from the lack of
    recent precipitation that the surface is probably dry and traction is
    okay. 

    We need to make a water run within the next few days, so I hope the
    storms don’t get here before we get it done.  It’s no big deal,
    really.  We have drinking water, enough to last a week or
    more.  If we have to delay the water run, I’ll have to “bathe”
    with wet wipes.  The dirty dishes will accumulate.  Doug
    won’t mind that until the time comes to wash them all.

    Later, all.

  • CENSORSHIP

    Among some of the Featured_Grownups,
    there is currently a discussion of censorship.  I have not yet
    read anyone else’s entries.  This is not because I am not
    interested in their views.  It is primarily because I might be
    induced to enter into an argument or influenced to try not to repeat what others have said already, so I
    want to get my ideas down here before I am exposed to anyone else’s.

    Don’t let that mislead you.  For the most part, my ideas on
    censorship are other people’s ideas.  I can barely speak on the
    topic without quoting someone.  Here are a few of my favorite quotes on, around and about censorship:

    “Freedom begins when you
    tell Mrs. Grundy to go fly a kite.”  [Mrs. Grundy defined]
     
    “Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny.” [If you don't get the connection between secrecy and censorship, think about it.]

    “Limiting the freedom of news ‘just a little bit’ is in the same category with the classic example ‘a little bit pregnant’.”

    “The whole principle is wrong; it’s like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can’t eat steak.”

    Those four are all from one writer:  Robert Anson Heinlein.

    “REVOLUTION, n. A bursting of the boilers which usually takes place when the safety valve of public discussion is closed.”

    – Ambrose Bierce, The Enlarged Devil’s Dictionary (1906)

    “Fear of serious injury cannot alone
    justify suppression of free speech and assembly. Men feared witches and
    burned women. It is the function of speech to free men from the bondage
    of irrational fears.”

    – U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis

    “The press is easier to strangle than to look in the eyes.”

    – Winston Churchill

    “Restriction on free thought and free
    speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one
    un-American act that could most easily defeat us.”

    –U.S. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas

    “Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost.”

    and…

    “I am opposed to any form of tyranny over the mind of man.”

    – Thomas Jefferson

    “Censorship of anything, at any time, in
    any place, on whatever pretense, has always been and always will be the
    last resort of the boob and the bigot.”

    – Eugene Gladstone O’Neill, American playwright

    There are some differences between me
    and some of the writers quoted above.  Unlike Brandeis, that other
    Douglas (with one ess), Churchill and Jefferson, I am not a dead white
    man, and I have nowhere near the socio-political clout they had during
    their lifetimes.   But, like Eugene O’Neill and Robert A.
    Heinlein, my work has offended Mrs. Grundy and she has on certain
    occasions done what she could to muzzle me.  I was denied a place
    and a voice in some venues.  I responded to that by finding other
    venues where I could express myself fully.
    I cannot perceive any benefit to society or the planet from any form of
    censorship.  As much as I deplore much of the nonsense and
    self-serving bullshit I see and hear, I would not advocate shutting
    anyone up. 

    I think that parents who lie to their children or seek to shield them
    from the truth are misguided and are ultimately committing a subtle but
    destructive form of child abuse.  I would not, however, seek to
    stop them.  They get what they deserve when the kids grow up and
    learn the truth.  What I do object to, however, is any attempt a
    parent might make to abridge the right of another person to tell the
    truth within the hearing of those children the lying parent is trying
    to “shield.”

    An amusing instance of this occurred during this Christmas season just
    past.  On public radio, someone being interviewed had said, in
    connection with some recent egregious example of government bullshit,
    “If you believe that, you probably believe in Santa Claus.”  An
    irate listener complained to NPR, saying that he resented the fact that
    his young child heard it and began questioning him about Santa. 
    The news reader who reported that bit of listener feedback tried and
    failed to completely suppress the amusement in his voice.

    I am sure that some people find my frequent references to the Santa
    Claus lie to be tiresome.  Tough shit, I say.  A lie is
    a lie, even when it is “merely” a polite hypocrisy or a “little”
    “white” lie.  I have no objection to someone who truly believes in
    Santa Claus expressing those beliefs.  My objection is to the
    wanton and willful propagation of falsehood.  Lies debase and
    degrade the liars as much as they deceive those being lied to. 
    Lies lead to secrecy and censorship in the interest
    of covering the lies.

    I am wholeheartedly in favor of the truth,
    the whole truth and nothing but the truth.  The “truth” I’m
    alluding to here is a personal thing.  I don’t mean that some
    deluded soul should be hushed because some supposedly wiser or better
    informed being judges his words to be false.  Truth is not always
    factual, not always “real” except in the mind of the one telling his
    own truth, but unless it is allowed to be told there is no chance for
    anyone to do any fact-checking or give any constructive feedback. 
    Even the “wise” and well-educated ones can be blind-sided by a radical
    new idea.   Can we afford to silence anyone just because his
    ideas are deemed false or dangerous by someone else?  I think not.


    Image by Frank Miller for the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund

  • In local news…

    Greyfox phoned and woke me this morning as soon as he saw the front page of the Anchorage Daily News
    It was a story that we and all our neighbors had followed with outrage
    and horror about a year and a half ago.  I wrote about it here at
    the time.  Here is the latest:

    The adoptive parents at the center of a bizarre Mat-Su child abuse case pleaded no contest to greatly reduced charges Wednesday.

    Patrick Kelley, 45, was immediately released after nearly 17 months in
    jail, having served all the time required in a deal with the Palmer
    prosecutor’s office.

    Sherry Kelley, 36, also was released when Anchorage Superior Court
    Judge Michael Wolverton lowered her bail from $100,000 to $1,000.

    Both had been held since Sept. 13, 2004, on dozens of felony and
    misdemeanor charges, including assault and kidnapping, that alleged
    mistreatment of their five adopted children.

    All but three of the charges were dismissed under the plea deal.

    The Kelleys were state-licensed foster parents in Anchorage when the
    children were first placed with them. The state then let them adopt the
    children, paying them $3,400 a month in adoption subsidies.

    At a Mat-Su compound where the family ended up, the children went
    hungry, were kept out of school, were forced to do extended manual
    labor, bathed in a pond and slept in junk vans, state troopers said.
    Troopers found them there in July 2004 when the girls were ages 6, 14
    and 15 and the boys were 10 and 13.

    Some of the children were hit with shovels, pipes or other tools, and
    one boy was sealed naked in a coffinlike box, troopers alleged. The
    other boy suffered burns that became infested with maggots.

    But defense attorney Josh Fannon said many of the stories were
    exaggerated or just plain wrong. “The Kelleys have had 17 months of
    bashing and beatings by our community,” he said.

    The real story should come out at the sentencing, now set for July 14,
    he said. “Many of the horrific things are going to be cleared up.”

    Prosecutor Rachel Gernat said she believed the children’s stories of
    life with the Kelleys but the evidence wasn’t enough to take to a jury.

    On Wednesday, Sherry Kelley pleaded no contest to assault in the third
    degree for injuring the arm of the younger boy, and criminal nonsupport
    of the children, a misdemeanor meaning she didn’t do what a parent is
    supposed to do. She faces a sentence of no more than six years.
    Forty-one other charges against her were dismissed Wednesday.

    Patrick Kelley was essentially an absent parent who didn’t step in to
    stop the mistreatment, Gernat said. He pleaded to a single charge of
    endangering the welfare of the children. Thirty-eight other charges
    were dismissed.

    In court Wednesday, the Kelleys huddled close, their wrists shackled
    together. Patrick Kelley, his light brown hair neatly trimmed, was
    dressed in jailhouse yellow. Sherry Kelley, her dark hair long and
    flowing, wore a red uniform that signifies she has been segregated from
    other inmates. The reason is confidential, a prison spokesman said.

    Under the plea deal, both agreed to permanently give up their rights to
    the four older children. They were never charged with abusing the
    youngest child, the prosecutor said. The OCS will likely seek to sever
    their rights to her, the prosecutor said.

    When the case burst into public view in September 2004, OCS was accused
    of failing the children by entrusting them to the Kelleys. Officials
    said at the time that they cannot check on children, including adopted
    ones, unless the family seeks help or someone files a complaint. But
    they claimed they couldn’t explain their actions because of
    confidentiality restrictions.

    A new state law lifts confidentiality in certain situations. But OCS
    said it doesn’t apply to situations that existed before the law changed
    and refused to say Wednesday how the children are doing.

    Most of the kids involved here had been taken away from their
    drug-addicted mother, so there had been plenty of trauma in their lives
    even before the state handed them over to the Kelleys.  I 
    have a strong and sickening feeling that in order to cover their own
    asses some people in the OCS decided to alter records or cover up
    facts.  If that is not the case, then they simply did not know a
    lot of things that they, as part of their job, are supposed to know.

    There is more at that ADN link above.

    I had something in mind to blog about for today, and may get to it later.  For now, this is what’s on my mind.

  • Do you know what next Tuesday is?

    February 14…

    Valentines Day, obviously, but that’s not all.

    It is the second Tuesday in February, and that means that in New Mexico it is officially Extraterrestrial Culture Day
    State Representative Daniel Foley from Roswell proposed this
    memorial.  “They have some sort of culture, whether it’s something
    we understand or not,” he said.  His proposal claimed that
    extraterrestrials have contributed to the recognition of New Mexico.

    The New Mexico House of Representatives approved it in March of
    2003.  As a memorial, it doesn’t have the force of law and I don’t
    suppose anyone outside of Roswell will get the day off.  In fact,
    in Roswell it may be such a big day that nobody can be spared to take a
    day off.  If I were planning to go somewhere to celebrate ET
    Culture Day, Roswell would be the place.

    I hadn’t known about this until I heard someone on the radio mention today
    that tomorrow is Extraterrestrial Culture Day.  As soon as Doug
    gave up the computer and went to bed, I went to Google to check it
    out.  I found one source, the South Jersey Courier-Post Online,
    that listed it as February 9 in the “Multicultural Calender”
    (sic).  They were probably copying that date from a previous year
    in which February started on a Monday.  If they can’t spell
    calendar correctly, how can they be expected to get their dates right?

    I love New Mexico… ice caves, lava tubes, El Malpais, the Gila
    Wilderness, Mimbres and Mimbreños, the Burro Mountains and Florida
    Mountains, the mineral museum in Socorro, Rockhound State Park, the
    Rockhound Roundup… and Roswell.  What’s not to love?

    New Mexico has a few things in common with Alaska, too.  Some of
    them are cultural and politico-economic, and at least one of them is
    just sorta weird and mildly interesting.  As far as I know, we are
    the only two states that are commonly mistaken for foreign countries by
    other Americans.

    I have long been familiar with the common phenomenon of trying to place
    a catalog order by phone and, when I get to the, “Alaska,” part of my
    address, being told that they only ship to the United States.

    When I was on my honeymoon in Silver City, New Mexico, I was delighted to find in a copy of New Mexico
    magazine, the regular feature, “One of our Fifty is Missing.” 
    Readers send in their anecdotes about encountering geographically
    challenged Americans who don’t recognize New Mexico’s statehood. 
    I wrote in and told them it should be “Two of our Fifty are Missing.”

    So, what do you plan to do to celebrate Extraterrestrial Culture Day?

  • VOLCANOES THIS WEEK

    Augustine Volcano in Lower Cook Inlet quieted and was downgraded to concern level orange. 

    Cleveland Volcano, out in the Aleutian Islands, erupted and emitted an ash cloud.

    Augustine is within line-of-sight of populated parts of the Alaskan
    mainland, is ringed with seismic sensors and overseen by two
    webcams.  We have had daily bulletins reporting its activity
    throughout this eruption sequence.

    Cleveland is remote from the populous areas, has no seismic network, no
    webcams.  The eruption and ash cloud were reported by pilots who
    happened to see them as they flew by.

    Augustine made the national TV news and appeared in the syndicated newspaper feature, Earthweek.  Our local radio stations kept us informed of ashfall hazards several times a day.  Even the Alaska Volcano Observatory doesn’t know what’s going on out at Cleveland.


    Yesterday in my Neighborhood
    The temperature was about 23 degrees.  The snow was soft but not
    wet or slushy.  The air was moist and breathable.  Bareheaded
    and gloveless, I was comfortable enough to go out the cul de sac.  I could feel the warmth of the sun on my face. 
    I found a few traces of ash on the snow, some large flakes that might
    have come from someone’s chimney, or could have come from the
    volcano.  Other than those few bits of ash and even fewer
    fragments of trees scattered on the snow, the berms and tracks left by
    the snowplow, and one other set of footprints besides mine, the surface
    was pristine.

    Today, it doesn’t look like this.  The sky is overcast.  The
    temperature is 30 degrees, right at the slush threshhold.  The
    wind blew yesterday, knocking some of those big clumps of snow out of
    the trees.  The snowpack is pocked and ragged-looking.  If we
    get any precip today, it will be freezing rain.  Next time I go
    out there, it will be a whole different world.

  • Insidious Hazards of Free Speech

    I have written on several occasions about my appreciation for the First
    Amendment, particularly the right of free speech.  I’m not sure I
    am capable of keeping my thoughts to myself.  If I did, I would
    probably explode.

    This, the efficacy of self-expression for letting off steam, is one of
    the weaknesses in our system.  We protest and picket, satirize and
    criticize our imbecilic politicians and some of us get the feeling from
    this that we are doing something.  Perhaps, in a system where we
    were not allowed to express our dissent, we would be more likely to
    rise up and overthrow the corrupt system.

    That’s one hazard in free speech, one that’s been on my mind for a while.  Today, I learned about this other one:


    Reverend Fred Phelps (right, above) of Westboro Baptist Church, Topeka,
    Kansas, and his congregation made up mostly of members of his extended
    family, have been pushing the limits of free speech.  They plan to
    picket Coretta Scott King’s funeral this week, and have picketed the
    funerals of miners killed in West Virginia and soldiers killed in Iraq.

    Many news stories report that they go beyond the bounds of “speech”,
    into stalking, assault and harrassment.  They have intimidated the
    police in their hometown.   Images on their website could be
    considered pornographic, and much of Phelps’s invective is
    obscene.  They evade the prohibition of “fighting_words,” only narrowly.

    Ostensibly, they want the U.S. to outlaw sodomy, but one of the members
    has said that even if that was done, they would find some other cause
    to picket.  I’m still thinking about all of this.  I may have
    more to say
    about it later on.  My intuitive feeling is that Rev. Phelps is a
    cynical hypocrite who doesn’t actually believe everything he preaches,
    but is using these inflammatory ideas as a ploy to gain power and
    attention.  Feel free to comment, whether you agree or not. 
    It is your right, after all.