Month: December 2004

  • Out with the old…

    Greyfox
    and I have worked our separate ways through the entire backlog of
    past-life readings (for him) and the readings on present reality and
    future potentials that are my department over at KaiOaty
    There had been a backlog because we had both been neglecting that work
    and that site for about a year, from November of 2003.  Now, in
    less than two months we have done as much of the backlog as we could,
    all except for a few requests from clients who had
    disappeared from Xanga in the interim and couldn’t be reached to
    confirm or update their requests, or who didn’t respond to our emails.

    At least, I think we’ve done it all.  I could have missed
    someone.  There were a few months that I couldn’t access the email
    account that is linked from that site, and the inbox filled up and
    bounced some email.  I still have a nagging feeling I’ve forgotten
    someone, but that could be just the ones who didn’t get back to me, or
    my awareness of the indexing I haven’t caught up with.  If you
    have been
    waiting for a reading from Greyfox or me, and haven’t seen it, check KaiOaty
    Look at the Subscriptions list on the home page.  If your name is
    there, we’ve done at least one reading for you and it is there
    somewhere.  I’ve subscribed to everyone we’ve done readings for,
    and to no one else.  If you asked for a reading and your name
    isn’t there, please try again.  I’m paying attention now.

    While we were working on the backlog, some new requests came in, and we
    have taken care of all of them now. too.  It feels good not to
    have a backlog there (except for that tedious indexing and the routine
    checking of links, etc., that must be done eventually– and two more
    FAQ pages I can’t even start on until I recall the topics or find my
    notes….).  But I have a backlog elsewhere, too, that I can
    dispense with more easily.  I have this load of quizzes and
    questionnaires I have been doing in the past few weeks and did not post
    because… for reasons that… frankly, for reasons I cannot now recall
    and might not ever have had at all.  I didn’t post them then, when
    I answered the questions, but I’m posting them now, okay?


    WHAT DO YOU CALL:

    The geographic basics: Born in California, reared all over the west and midwest.

    A body of water, smaller than a river, contained within relatively narrow banks.   creek

    What the thing you push around the grocery store is called. cart (or now that I’m older, “walker”)

    A metal container to carry a meal in.  lunch box

    The thing that you cook bacon and eggs in. skillet

    The piece of furniture that seats three people. couch

    The device on the outside of the house that carries rain off the roof. gutter

    The covered area outside a house where people sit in the evening. porch

    Carbonated, sweetened, non-alcoholic beverages. pop

    A flat, round breakfast food served with syrup. pancakes

    A long sandwich designed to be a whole meal in itself.  dagwood

    The piece of clothing worn by men at the beach. trunks

    Shoes worn for sports. sneakers

    Putting a room in order. tidying up

    A flying insect that glows in the dark. firefly

    The little insect that curls up into a ball. pill bug

    The children’s playground equipment where one kid sits on one side and
    goes up while the other sits on the other side and goes down.
    teeter-totter

    How do you eat your pizza? with my fingers if it’s not too floppy, from
    the center out, and always eat the crust — mine and that of anyone who
    leaves theirs

    What’s it called when private citizens put up signs and sell their used stuff? yard sale

    What’s the evening meal? dinner

    The thing under a house where the furnace and perhaps a rec room are? basement

    What word(s) do you use to address a group of two or more people? 
    you guys or y’all (familiarly) or more formally, “everybody” as in
    “everybody, listen up!”

    Would you say “Are you coming with?” as a full sentence, to mean “Are you coming with us?” no

    Would you say “where are youat?” to mean “where are you?”  no

    Modals are words like “can,” “could,” “might,” “ought to,” and so on.
    Can you use more than one modal at a time? I shouldn’t ought to, but I
    might could do it.

    What do you call the area of grass between the sidewalk and the road? verge or parking, depending on my audience

    What do you call the area of grass that occurs in the middle of some streets? Median.

    What do you call the long narrow place in the middle of a divided highway? Median

    What do you call the drink made with milk and ice cream? Milkshake.

    What do you call the miniature lobster that one finds in lakes and
    streams for example (a crustacean of the family Astacidae)? Crayfish.

    What do you call the kind of spider (or spider-like creature) that has
    an oval-shaped body and extremely long legs? Daddy Longlegs.

    What nicknames do/did you use for your maternal grandmother? none

    What about your paternal grandmother (is there a distinction?) none (both grandmothers died before I was born)

    What do/did you call your maternal grandfather? Grandpa

    paternal grandfather? nothing — he died before I was born

    What do you call the big clumps of dust that gather under furniture and
    in corners? Dust bunnies, and around my house they don’t hide, they get
    right out in the middle of the room.

    What term do you use to refer to something that is across both streets
    from you at an intersection (or diagonally across from you in general)?
    catty corner.

    What do you call the activity of driving around in circles in a car? Do
    you mean brodies, doughnuts: spinning, as opposed to just getting
    lost?  They’re both brodies and donuts to me, since I moved around
    a lot as a kid.

    What do you call paper that has already been used for something or is otherwise imperfect? Scratch paper.

    What is your *general* term for a big road that you drive relatively fast on? Freeway

    What do you call it when rain falls while the sun is shining?  a rainbow

    When you are cold, and little points of skin begin to come on your arms and legs, you have- Goosebumps

    What do you call the gooey or dry matter that collects in the corners
    of your eyes, especially while you are sleeping?  gunk

    What do you call an easy course? a no-brainer

    What do you call a traffic situation in which several roads meet in a
    circle and you have to get off at a certain point? roundabout

    What is the thing that women use to tie their hair? a ribbon

    Do you use the word cruller?   no, I eat donuts

    Do you use the term “bear claw” for a kind of pastry?  yes, unless it’s a danish or a bismarck or a blintz or….

    What do you call someone who is the opposite of pigeon-toed (i.e. when they walk their feet point outwards)?  bow-legged

    Can you call coleslaw “slaw”?  yes

    What do you call the box you bury a dead person in? coffin

    Do you say “vinegar and oil” or “oil and vinegar” for the type of salad dressing? either way

    What do you call it when a driver changes over one or more lanes way too quickly? weaving

    When you stand outside with a long line of people waiting to get in
    somewhere, are you standing “in line” or “on line” (as in, “I stood ___
    in the cold for two hours before they opened the doors”)? In line.

    Do you say “frosting” or “icing” for the sweet spread one puts on a cake? frosting unless it is boiled icing

    What is “the City”? San Francisco

    What is the distinction between dinner and supper? supper is later than dinner

    Do you cut or mow the lawn or grass? I can mow it with a mower or cut it with scissors or a scythe.

    Do you pass in homework or hand in homework? Turn it in.

    What do you call the insect that looks like a large thin spider and skitters along the top of water? water strider

    What do you call the thing from which you might drink water in a school? water fountain

    What do you call a public railway system (normally underground)? Subway

    What do you call the act of covering a house or area in front of a house with toilet paper? TP’ing.

    What do you call a traffic jam caused by drivers slowing down to look
    at an accident or other diversion on the side of the road? 
    rubberneckers

    What do you call the paper container in which you might bring home items you bought at the store?  A bag.

    What do you call the night before Halloween? Oct 30.

    What do you call the end of a loaf of bread? The heel

    What do you call a point that is purely academic, or that cannot be settled and isn’t worth discussing further? Moot.

    How do you pronounce the -sp- sequence in “thespian” (the word meaning “actor”)? Thes-pyan

    What do you call a drive-through liquor store? insane

    What do you call food that you buy at a restaurant but then eat at home? takeout

    What do you say when you want to lay claim to the front seat of a car? I’m driving.

    Do you say “expecially”, or “especially”? Especially.



    If You Were in Beowulf…
    created with QuizFarm.com
    You scored as The Dragon.
    Ancient, chaotic, and a bit mysterious is the Dragon figure.  Awakened
    from your happy slumber upon a pile of gold, you go about the country
    slaying its occupants.  Beowulf manages to kill you, but not before you
    ensure his death.  Congrats.



    It could have been worse, I suppose.  I might have come out as Beowulf or his mother.


    Now this next one I endorse wholeheartedly.  I knew that long
    before I took the quiz.  Doug told me I was chaotic good years ago
    when he started playing D&D, but I’d divined it for myself even
    before that, using dowsing rods and a method taught to me by my
    half-Romany friend Jovano.  He taught it to me so I could evaluate
    my potential clients and new acquaintances, but as usual I turned it on
    myself first.

    You scored as Chaotic Good. A Chaotic Good person is
    someone who has little intrinsic respect for laws or authority, seeing
    them as insufficient to sustain what’s right.  These people work
    according to their own moral compass which, while good, is not
    necessarily always aligned with that of society.  Despite their
    chaotic tendancies, these people are good at heart.



    Chaotic Good
    What is your Alignment?
    created with QuizFarm.com




    Which Fantasy/SciFi Character Are You?

    A
    stern yet benevolent organizer who often knows best, your wits are
    keenly fixed on aiding efforts you deem worthy.Now at this last we must
    take a hard road, a road unforseen. There lies our hope, if hope it be.
    To walk into peril to Mordor.




     




    You are 87% Virgo
    Your Dominant Intelligence is Linguistic Intelligence
    You
    are excellent with words and language. You explain yourself well.An
    elegant speaker, you can converse well with anyone on the fly.You are
    also good at remembering information and convicing someone of your
    point of view.A master of creative phrasing and unique words, you enjoy
    expanding your vocabulary.You would make a fantastic poet, journalist,
    writer, teacher, lawyer, politician, or translator.



    New Year’s Wishes

    I’d say these were my prayers instead of my wishes, except that I’m with Jim Morrison on the topic of petitioning prayer: 

    When I was back there in seminary school

    There was a person there

    Who put forth the proposition

    That you can petition the Lord with prayer

    Petition the lord with prayer

    Petition the lord with prayer??

    You cannot petition the lord with prayer!
    (The Doors,
    The Soft Parade)

    When I speak to the god within, I’m not
    petitioning, but affirming.  Since I lack the power to affirm for
    you, I’ll wish for you in the new year what I affirm for myself always:

    the serenity to accept the things we cannot change,
    the courage to change the things we can,
    and the wisdom to know the difference.

    If that is your desire, you can affirm it for yourself.


  • I’m not nice, but I used to be.

    No, that’s not precisely what I meant to say.  “Nice” used to mean
    something closer to what I am than it does now.  That’s closer to
    what I mean.

    I don’t care much for the word, “nice”.   Henry here, Jane Austen’s character, expresses my view nicely:

    “I am sure,” cried Catherine, “I did
    not mean to say anything wrong; but it is a nice book, and why should I
    not call it so?” “Very true,” said Henry, “and this is a very nice day,
    and we are taking a very nice walk; and you are two very nice young
    ladies. Oh! It is a very nice word indeed! It does for everything.”
    [Jane Austen, "Northanger Abbey"]

    Once, someone said I’m not very nice (it could have been I myself who
    said it) and Greyfox informed me that by the “original” meaning of the
    word — and I think he was referring to the sense in which Will
    Shakespeare used it — I was quite nice.  He said that originally
    it meant precise and correct in speech.

    It was not until recently that I looked it up and discovered that
    although he was correct about Shakespeare’s sense of the word, the word
    had by that time already shifted distinctly away from its “original” or
    first recorded meaning.

    Here is what I found at the Online Etymology Dictionary (which is also where I found the Jane Austen quote above):

    c.1290, “foolish, stupid, senseless,”
    from O.Fr. nice “silly, foolish,” from L. nescius “ignorant,” lit.
    “not-knowing,” from ne- “not” (see un-) + stem of scire “to know.”
    “The sense development has been extraordinary, even for an adj.”
    [Weekley] — from “timid” (pre-1300); to “fussy, fastidious” (c.1380);
    to “dainty, delicate” (c.1405); to “precise, careful” (1500s, preserved
    in such terms as a nice distinction and nice and early); to “agreeable,
    delightful” (1769); to “kind, thoughtful” (1830).
    In 16c.-17c. it is often difficult to determine exactly what is meant
    when a writer uses this word. By 1926, it was pronounced “too great a
    favorite with the ladies, who have charmed out of it all its
    individuality and converted it into a mere diffuser of vague and mild
    agreeableness.” [Fowler]

    Since I am not even mildly or vaguely agreeable and have no wish to
    agree with most ladies (and I don’t mean women), perhaps I should just leave the word to them.

    Another word that has been giving me a tough time lately is,
    “sentimentality.”  A long time ago, Greyfox quoted me a quote
    saying that, “sentimentality means loving something more than God
    does.”  I like that definition.  It seems fitting to the
    maudlin propensity I see among my supposed peers (the “ladies”) to go
    all choked-up and sad over things that to me seem either natural and
    inevitable (and thus cry out for acceptance and not for sadness) and
    other things that are outrageous and unnatural and thus require active
    resistance and change, rather than self-defeating sadness that changes
    nothing and hurts only the one who indulges in it.

    I wanted to write about that, but first I wanted to find out who said it.  My old fart, Greyfox,
    is a great rememberer and quoter of quotations, but not so good at
    remembering who said it.  As for myself, the “nice” one in the
    family, I feel stupid quoting someone and saying, “someone
    said…”  It is important not only to my erudite image, but to the
    satisfaction of my curiosity, that I know whom I’m quoting if I’m
    putting quotation marks around a statement.

    I put the quote in a Google search box, and although it did return a
    few results it did not satisfy my need.  It created a new
    dilemma.  According to the wondrous web, the origin of that
    statement was either J.D. Salinger, or the “haiku poet”
    R.H.Blythe.   The former name, I recognized.  The
    latter, I did not.  So I searched again.

    Now I have a new dilemma:  was Blythe actually a poet, or did he
    only translate and interpret haiku?  I know he was a translator
    and interpreter, but I have only the one source, the one that quoted
    him on sentimentality, saying he’s a poet.  Can I safely dismiss
    that source as unreliable and attribute the quote to Salinger?  I
    don’t know.

    So, here I go….  Someone once said that sentimentality is loving
    something more than God does.  I agree.  If any of my readers
    here can cite for me the work in which Salinger or Blythe or anyone
    else said that, I’d appreciate it.


    The Old Fart had a couple of news stories today he shared with me and
    thought I might want to share with you.  He was correct.


    Jaye Ulak and Jimmy Walker of Scammon Bay are teenage Alaska Native
    rappers who were separately “discovered” by a village social worker
    after they’d attempted suicide.  She has raised money and flown
    them out to behavioral health conferences in Anchorage and
    Seattle.  The young men call their duo “Blood Family”, and they
    rap about village life, addiction, suicide and elders being
    disrespected.  About their message, Walker said, “It’s getting
    through, even to the adults.”

    Stacia Backensto is a doctoral candidate studying ravens in the oil fields on the North Slope of the Brooks Range.

    “They’re savvy creatures, and sometimes for me it was a question of
    who’s going to be studied today,” she said. “Are they studying me or I
    studying them? Who’s in charge of this situation?”

    Backensto disguises herself with borrowed coveralls and hard
    hat, but they still sometimes pick out her facial features and
    recognize her as the enemy.

    The same cleverness that makes ravens hard to study helps them thrive in the coldest region of America’s coldest state.

    “There was one that was a very aggressive raven in Kuparuk,” Backensto
    said. “The male — and we didn’t even trap the male, we trapped his
    mate, and put a radio transmitter on her — chased us off the pad for a
    mile.”

    “To understand their behavior and try to observe their behavior and not
    be a part of changing their behavior is very tricky,” she said. “It’s
    like hide-and-seek.”


    In less that 3 hours, Doug starts
    his next fanfic writing tournament.  This means I will have less
    competition for the PS2 and more competition for the computer for the
    next week or two.  In stark and gory contrast to the character he
    represented in the last tournament, Bam Margera, this time he will be
    Kyojiro Kagenuma from the game, Way of the Samurai II.  She is a
    bloodthirsty and sadistic yakuza.who apparently even scares her
    confederates.  Doug has been immersing himself in feudal Japanese
    culture in preparation, watching Rashomon and reading the Tomoe Gozen
    series of books.  I sorta wish that as a writer he was less of a
    method actor.  He has been a bit “short” with me lately, but at
    least he’s not swinging his sword in here.

  • Livin’ on shaky ground

    Confession:  I’m an earthquake freak.  I subscribe to BIGQUAKE email bulletins.  There’s a shortcut to NEIC
    in my browser’s link bar.  When I feel a quake, I
    participate.  I go to NEIC and fill out a “felt it” form.  I
    know (and care) about how long it takes P-waves to travel through the
    ground.  I know that tsunamis are not triggered by shaking, but by
    what gets shaken loose underwater and settles to the ocean floor. 
    I was hip to tectonic plates and continental drift long before any of
    that “radical new” science made it into school textbooks. 

    When the 8.1 quake hit north of Macquarie Island off Antarctica on
    December 23, I caught the BIGQUAKE email and started looking up details
    online.  Then I started waiting for the other shoe to drop. 
    Thus, I wasn’t caught by surprise yesterday evening when the BIGQUAKE
    alert for the 9.0 event off Sumatra hit my inbox.  When that alert
    first came out, though, it didn’t say 9.0 magnitude.  It said 8.5,
    and the French Observatory was calling it 8.0, while the Indonesian
    authorities rated it at 6.4.  I didn’t learn until I woke up today
    that it had been upgraded to 9.0.  The last earthquake bigger than
    this one was forty years ago, on Good Friday, here in Alaska.

    I don’t know why I get those “feelings” that earthquakes are coming –
    I hadn’t had any presentiment of the one off Antarctica — and I
    haven’t a clue how that “sense” might work.  I don’t know, either,
    how and why it is that I feel small local quakes that nearly no one
    else around me is aware of.  Not knowing how and why is a minor
    little itch in the back of my mind, while the WHAT of it gets most of
    my attention.  In the earth’s crust one thing leads to another in
    a ripple effect, and I’m more interested in where the next shock will
    occur than in when.  That it WILL come, that the pressure will be
    released somewhere, is a given.  I’m intensely interested in the
    patterns of distribution.

    Before I got internet access, my ability to monitor this stuff was much
    less, and the attention I paid to it was more sporadic.  I’d
    notice when some big event made the news or when I was feeling a lot of
    local shaking, and I’d get curious.  Now I have access to maps and charts and tables,
    and I spend time studying them.  The Pacific Ring of Fire has been
    getting a lot of my attention in recent months because it has been
    active.  Sometimes I just gaze at the map
    (the one below shows activity 8-30 days ago) to see what I see. 
    I’m not looking for anything in particular.  I wouldn’t know what
    to look for.  I just look and sometimes I see a pattern. 
    Here I see a pattern of deep events, but I’d have to go to the charts
    and tables to get the timing of them before they’d make any sense to
    me.  Maybe I will, or maybe I’ll go back and search the news for
    some more reports of the human side of last night’s events.  It’s
    all fascinating to me.

    Yesterday when I’d seen the BIGQUAKE alert and went to Google News,
    there were two stories available.  That’s when I learned of the
    disparity among the magnitude reports.  By the time I stopped
    haunting the news sites about six hours later and went to bed, there
    were over 600 reports.  When I got up today there were almost
    2,000, and it had become the top story.

    In imagination, I hear the cries of, “Oh, the humanity!”  Some of
    the news reports of tsunami damage and casualties I’ve been reading
    today list several previous tsunamis that have hit the same
    areas.  One of the interesting facts about our species is that we
    apparently like to settle on shaky ground, on some of the most
    dangerous ground around.  The “cradle of civilization” was in the
    area of crumbled crust where several plates meet and there is nothing
    even remotely resembling solid bedrock.  The planet’s largest
    cities are located on the margins of oceans and in the flood plains of
    great rivers.  I understand the economics and logistics involved
    there, the proximity to navigable water, not to mention the attraction
    of ocean breezes and ocean views.  What I don’t understand is the
    surprise and consternation exhibited when the earth and the oceans do
    what they’ve been doing all along.

    I’ve lived on the prairies where the relative safety from shaking and
    flooding is offset by the wind.  They can have it.  My
    preference is for mountains.  The place I’ve chosen to live is
    another area where there is no solid bedrock.  Here at the edge of
    the North American plate, where the Pacific Plate has thrust these
    mountains up and has ground the earth’s crust to bits, we have
    volcanos, too.  The wind blows, the ground shakes, the snow piles
    up, and occasionally there’s volcanic ash piling up as well.  It’s
    that kind of planet, filled with breathtaking vistas and all the things
    we need to support life, as well as any number of hazards that might at
    any moment snuff out a few thousand of our lives.  That’s life on
    planet Earth.  I love it — don’t you?

  • What a marvelous night…
        and a pretty good day, too.

    When I was a little girl, for the six Christmases before my father
    died, the holiday was always joyous.  There was a tree and
    decorations, always a few presents even though my parents never had
    much money to spare, the music of the season — both the upbeat and
    happy tunes and the moving old carols — and most of all there was
    love.  The profile pic I’ve had up here for a couple of weeks
    shows me on my second Xmas, at fifteen months of age, playing with my
    new alphabet blocks in front of the Christmas tree, at the wicker table
    and chair my father had salvaged from the dump.   My parents’ love
    for each other and for me gave our little house furnished with things
    other people had discarded an atmosphere of peace and security I would
    never experience again in this lifetime.

    I recall nothing of
    the Christmas of 1951, just a bit over three weeks after my father
    died.  Maybe we had a tree and presents, or maybe my mother wasn’t
    up to that.  She was an emotional basket case for years after his
    death, and my lack of recall of that time speaks eloquently of my own
    mental state then.  There were days that Mama was doing well to
    open some canned soup for supper.  I learned to “cook” then,
    opening the cans and heating the soup and serving us both.

    Even after Mama began adjusting to life without Daddy, December would
    plunge her back into deep depressions every year.  The Christmas
    blues was a simple fact of my adolescence, something Mama and I shared
    and got through somehow, leaning on each other, the blind leading the
    blind.  Even after I was out of her house and on my own or in one
    of my marriages, Christmas blues usually found me.  It was an
    insecure life I led and I was scared much of the time.  Seeing
    tinsel and lights, the warmth showing from out of other people’s
    windows and the happiness in their eyes made me that much more aware of
    how much less I had than I had had in those idyllic years of childhood.

    I learned to cope with the blues the way my mother did, by getting
    loaded.  After I stopped doing that, I realized that it had never
    really helped.  It just made things worse in the long run. 
    So, yesterday evening after Doug went to bed, while I was baking my
    wheatless, gluten-free, sugar-free, pumpkin-free squash pies, for just
    a moment when a tinge of lonely blue hit me, I didn’t quite know what
    to do.  Getting loaded was not an option.  I’d need to wait
    until 9 PM when cell minutes lost their cost before I could call
    Greyfox, and being up to my elbows in pie fixings made getting online
    and tracking down any other friends impractical.

    For “company”
    and diversion, I turned on the radio, public radio, and caught the last
    part of All Things Considered followed by an Anglican Festival of 9
    Lessons in Carols as I finished up my work, just background sound to
    dispel that feeling of being all alone in the world.  About the
    time I got the pies done and sat down at the PS2, they segued into an
    hour of Jonathan Winters reading Dickens’s A Christmas Carol.  It was ending when Greyfox called, and by then my mood had swung from blue to pink, from down to up.

    We talked a while, caught each other up on the day’s events and
    discussed plans for today, then said good night.  The game wasn’t
    engaging my attention so, leaving the radio on, I got into bed and
    started reading.  It was much too early to sleep, but the bed is a
    warm spot and last night’s weather was COLD.  A brisk wind was
    sucking the heat out of the house and I had reason through the night to
    be glad that this time while Doug’s “diurnal rhythm”, asynchronous as
    it is to that of this planet, took him around to being wakeful in the
    daytime, my own sleep irregularities had brought me around to being
    awake at night to stoke the stove while he sleeps.

    [aside:  Recently, when I had persuaded Doug to stay up later than
    he liked, so we could make a run to the spring for water during
    daylight, he complained that it had screwed up his diurnal
    rhythm.  I remarked that his "rhythm" was more like brownian
    motion.  It got a laugh, which was what I was going for, but
    there's some truth in it, too.  Although for the most part he runs
    on a daily cycle that's around 26 hours long, occasionally he will
    either stay awake for up to 36 hours or sleep up to 14 hours and throw
    the whole cycle into a different phase.]

    My book is very
    absorbing.  The Camulod Chronicles series is so absorbing for me
    that after I’d gone through the first few volumes I stopped in the
    middle of Uther because it was too intense and was monopolizing my
    consciousness.  I was reading long into the night as I’m back to
    doing again now, and dreaming in the Dark Ages British culture after I
    put the books down at night.  Following a break of a few months, I
    got back into Uther and finished it and now I’m off and running again
    with Merlyn.  It’s an addiction.

    Last night, my attention
    was divided between the book and the Christmas music on the
    radio.  I listened to carols from various times and in many
    languages, and to little Christmas stories.  Then around 2 AM, it
    switched to piano jazz.  Jazz is my music.  Last night the
    Japanes pianist Harumi was asked what jazz means to her.  She
    answered, “freedom.”  Nailed it in one word!

    We were in
    the second hour of the jazz when Doug got up, and I went on reading and
    listening into the beginning of Weekend Edition, finally putting out my
    light and settling down about 5 AM.

    Greyfox got here before
    noon, and I had been up for a few hours by then.  He brought some
    groceries and a gift:  a 2-DVD set of old Western movies.  He
    shared some news stories, we had a few laughs, and he took Koji, who
    was ecstatic to have his whole pack together again, out for a short
    walk in the brisk subzero breezes.  As I was cooking the steak for
    our lunch Charley, my ex, called for an exchange of holiday
    wishes.  A little later, Charley’s mother, the only grandparent of
    Doug’s who lived long enough to get to know him, called.

    The
    subject of age came up, as Greyfox and I were talking about arthritis
    and fibro.  Then he said that one of the worst parts of getting
    old is his never-ending case of sticker shock.  He reminisced for
    a moment about how cheap this thing and that USED TO be, and I said
    that my mother used to tell me about when eggs were a dime a dozen and
    you could get bread for two cents a loaf.  Doug chimed in to say
    that the scariest thing about getting old was turning into your
    parents.  At that Greyfox said his sister, scary old Alyce, is
    turning into their dad:  She’s crazy, in active alcoholism and
    drug addiction, her kids are afraid of her….

    At one point earlier this afternoon, I reminded Greyfox of last Christmas
    – the one he said, “didn’t suck.”  From all indications, his
    holiday memories are even more painful than my own.  I asked him
    how this Christmas is for him.  He said, “It’s great! 
    …doesn’t seem like Christmas at all.” 

  • UPDATED: new snow pics at the end



    Two days left in the Christmas countdown,


    and how did reindeer get involved anyway?

    The
    species Rangifer tarandis is native to Scandinavia, Greenland, and other northern areas of Europe, Asia, and
    North America.  They had been native to Scotland
    until their extinction in the tenth century, and they were reintroduced
    there about half a century ago.  The wild ones are tasty and
    nutritious, and the domesticated ones are working stock in addition to
    being a source of meat and milk.  Generally they pull sleds, but
    in Siberia they are also ridden.

    Around here, in Alaska, they are known as caribou unless they are
    domesticated, in which case they become reindeer.  That makes
    sense doesn’t it?  Deer with reins are reindeer.  

    They
    are known from archaeological evidence in northern Europe to have been domesticated since
    sometime between the bronze age and iron age, close to three thousand
    years ago.

    The earliest known print reference to Santa Claus with (possibly) a single flying reindeer is this from William B. Gilley in A Children’s Friend (1821):

    “Old Santeclaus with much delight
    His reindeer drives this frosty
    night
    O’er chimney tops, and tracks of snow
    To bring his yearly
    gifts to you.”

    The image of Santa with a team of
    reindeer appears to have originated with Thomas Nast in a series of
    illustrations he drew between1863 and 1886, a few of which were copied
    as color lithographs by George P. Walker to illustrate a popular
    children’s book, Santa Claus and his Works, around 1870.


    (My source for much of the above info is B.K. Swartz, Jr.’s college course on Christmas history.)

    The likeliest origin for both Santa’s
    aeronautical reindeer and his residence at the North Pole is in the
    Russian myth of Father Frost, “ded moroz”.  In some ways, Father Frost is
    similar to the Anglo-American Jack Frost who personifies and explains
    the appearance of frost, hoarfrost, rime and Ice
    in freezing weather.  Even though Jack Frost has a chilling
    effect, he is an elfin and friendly character in comparison with the
    ancient pagan Father Frost, a powerful smith who forges rigid chains of
    ice to bind water to the earth in winter.  Some aspects of the
    Saint Nicholas legend have adhered to the older pagan ded moroz in contemporary Russia.

    That most famous reindeer of all, Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer was
    the brainchild of Robert L. May.  May worked for the
    Montgomery-Ward department store chain as an advertising copy
    writer.  The company had been buying Christmas coloring books as a
    promotional give-away to children.  In 1939, Robert May was asked
    to come up with a story that could be printed in a give-away
    booklet.  It was a money-saving scheme.

    May, drawing in part on the tale of The Ugly Duckling and his own
    background (he was a often taunted as a child for being shy, small, and
    slight), settled on the idea of an underdog ostracized by the reindeer
    community because of his physical abnormality: a glowing red nose.
    Looking for an alliterative name, May considered and rejected Rollo
    (too cheerful and carefree a name for the story of a misfit) and
    Reginald (too British) before deciding on Rudolph. He then proceeded to
    write Rudolph’s story in verse, as a series of rhyming couplets,
    testing it out on his 4-year-old daughter Barbara as he went along.
    Although Barbara was thrilled with Rudolph’s story, May’s boss was
    worried that a story featuring a red nose — an image associated with
    drinking and drunkards — was unsuitable for a Christmas tale. May
    responded by taking Denver Gillen, a friend from Montgomery Ward’s art
    department, to the Lincoln Park Zoo to sketch some deer. Gillen’s
    illustrations of a red-nosed reindeer overcame the hesitancy of May’s
    bosses, and the Rudolph story was approved. Montgomery Ward distributed
    2.4 million
    copies of the Rudolph booket in 1939, and although wartime paper
    shortages curtailed printing for the next several years, a total of 6 million copies had been given by the end of 1946.


    The

    post-war demand for licensing the Rudolph character was tremendous, but
    since May had created the story as an employee of Montgomery Ward, they
    held the copyright and he received no royalties. Deeply in debt from
    the medical bills resulting from his wife’s terminal illness (she died
    about the time May created Rudolph), May persuaded Montgomery Ward’s
    corporate president, Sewell Avery, to turn the copyright over to him in
    January 1947. With the rights to his creation in hand, May’s financial
    security was assured. “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer” was printed
    commercially in 1947 and shown in theaters as a nine-minute cartoon the
    following year. The Rudolph phenomenon really took off, however, when
    May’s brother-in-law, songwriter Johnny Marks, developed the lyrics and
    melody for a Rudolph song. Marks’ musical version of “Rudolph the
    Red-Nosed Reindeer” (turned down by many who didn’t want to meddle with
    the established Santa legend) was recorded by Gene Autry in 1949, sold
    two million copies that year, and went on to become one of the
    best-selling songs of all time (second only to “White Christmas”). A TV
    special about Rudolph narrated by Burl Ives was produced in 1964 and
    remains a popular perennial holiday favorite in the USA.

    May quit his copywriting job in 1951 and spent seven years
    managing his creation before returning to Montgomery Ward, where he
    worked until

    his retirement in 1971. May died in 1976, comfortable in the life his reindeer creation had provided for him.

    (source:  snopes.com)

    I had one of those books when I was
    little, and as children do I read it over and over until I knew the
    story by rote.  Although the best-known Rudolph is the
    one from the song and the subsequent short film narrated by Burl Ives,
    May’s original Rudolph wasn’t quite the same
    story.  Originally, Santa found Rudolph by accident when he
    noticed the glow from his nose as he was delivering gifts to the home
    where Rudolph lived with his loving parents.   I recall the
    first time I heard Gene Autry sing the song.  Mama and I were in
    our kitchen listening to the radio.  I must have been five years
    old, because that was when that record was released.  I was
    outraged and complained to my mother:  “He got the story all
    wrong!”


    I had planned to go to Wasilla today, to
    drive the van from the rehab center to the NA meeting.  It is
    snowing again here now after a brief rainfall this morning.  The
    highway is slushy in spots and icy in some of those places and in some
    places where there is no slush.  The back roads between here and
    the highway are even less navigable.  Greyfox’s report suggests
    that it’s even worse in town, so I’m staying home. 


    Doug, in between pauses to catch his breath, is shoveling snow from the
    roof so it won’t collapse on us.  When I woke this morning, he was
    at the PS2.  Sleepily, I asked, “How would you feel if you were
    sitting there when the roof caved in on us from the snow load?” 
    He thought for just the perfectly-timed comedic beat and answered,
    “Probably annoyed, because I wouldn’t have saved my game for a while.”

    My plan for this unexpected bonus time is to spend some of it at the
    computer and the rest working on a gluten-free pastry recipe for pie
    crust and a sugar-free “pumpkin” pie recipe to make use of some of the
    winter squash I have.  I also need to bake a fresh batch of those
    gluten-free muffins that are my main source of nutrients.  Not
    getting to town today means that Doug’s and my Xmas feast will be an
    improvised thing minus the spiral-sliced ham that Greyfox bought for us
    and a few other things I meant to buy, but there’s no danger of our
    going hungry.  The larder is full and there’s tenderloin steak in
    the freezer.

    Any suggestions for tomorrow’s Christmas Countdown segment?  If no
    one gives me any better ideas, I’ll probably go back to Santa Claus for
    an illustrated history of the evolution of his image.

    UPDATE — Doug was on the roof
    shoveling snow, when I noticed that sunset had turned the light to
    pink, so I got a couple of shots of it.

  • It kept on
    snowing.


    Throughout yesterday and into the night, the snow grew deeper.  I
    would have walked out and taken a comparison shot from the same POV as
    yesterday’s, but the snow that was merely over my boot tops in that
    previously packed path then is over my knees now.  Going out there
    would be stupid.

    Instead, I stayed in the paths that Doug has shoveled this morning, and kept the snow out of my boots this time.

    Greyfox called several times yesterday.  On one of those calls, he
    left the message that the weather service was predicting three to four
    feet of snow overnight north of Talkeetna.  We are just a bit
    south and west of Talkeetna.  We got between one and two feet here.

    Branches
    that yesterday were only sagging a little are bowed today.  If
    there was some sunshine, it would be pretty, “like a Christmas card,”
    as so many people have said of my photos. 

    With this gray sky, it looks a lot like the Christmas cards we get from
    our garbage collectors.  The Alaska Resource Group, which runs
    Talkeetna Refuse, has sent us the same photo cards for each of the last
    3 holiday seasons, as long as we’ve been using their services. 
    It’s a monochromatic snowy scene, presumably local, of a clear stream
    in a rocky creek bed.  They must have bought a wholesale lot of
    those cards, and maybe they have fewer customers than someone had
    anticipated when that order was placed.  For my money, they could
    find better ways to spend it than mailing out greeting cards.


    I know I may be sounding like Scrooge there.  The competitive sport of holiday spending baffles and befuddles me.  NFP
    addressed that issue today, with a link to an excellent opinion piece
    from some newspaper columnist. 

    This may be an appropriate place
    to insert the pic of our holiday wreath, our only seasonal
    decoration.  It came from the dumpster at Felony Flats and I have it because Greyfox
    didn’t want it.  The evergreen boughs are fake, and the fir cones
    are real.  The pink flowers and berries were presumably red before
    they faded, and the rope of aurora borealis beads appears to be
    something the person who discarded it had added (assuming that that
    person didn’t make the entire wreath) because Greyfox also fished out
    of the dumpster, at the same time, two more such bead strings new in
    the box.  I think it is lovely in its simplicity.  One of the loveliest things
    about it is that it is salvage, recycled.

    Doug
    has gotten most of the snow off my car so I can go to town
    tomorrow.  It is again my turn to drive the rehab van to the NA
    meeting.  It’s my mental health day, getting out among people,
    doing something useful and therapeutic.  I have been giving some
    thought about how and when to post tomorrow’s segment of the countdown
    to Christmas.  I’ve also been giving some thought to what its
    topic might be.  No firm conclusions on either of those questions
    yet.

    I have a topic for today, however.

    Today’s topic is:

    Why?

    Why?

    Why?

     Three days until Christmas


    Why would an almighty loving god send its
    offspring to a little planet circling a minor sun near the end of just
    another arm of just another spiral galaxy for the purpose of
    sacrificing himself so that the mortal creatures of that planet might
    be saved by that sacrifice from the jealous wrath of that loving
    almighty god?  Balderdash, nonsense and bullshit!

    What would Jesus do?  What would that incarnation of the Christos
    do if he were here now to respond in a televised interview to such a
    question?  Would he shake his head and tsk tolerantly at the way
    his message has been distorted, or would he go berserk as he did with
    the moneychangers in the temple?

    It’s apparent to any open-minded seeker of wisdom and truth that the
    Apostle Paul, Saul of Tarsus, was the origin of the “sacrificial lamb”
    crap that crept into Christianity.  It was a central tenet of his
    native religion, Mithraism.   Every year, Saul’s people would
    select a “Solar King”, a poor sap who was wined, dined and lionized,
    fattened up for the slaughter and then killed as a sacrifice to their
    jealous vengeful god so that he wouldn’t take his wrath out on the rest
    of them for their human frailties.

    The Heavenly Father that Joshua ben Joseph spoke of and worshipped was and IS loving, omniscient, omnipotent and far above such petty bullshit. 

    So, if any of my readers has gotten this far and can either agree that
    the “sacrifice” model for Christ’s incarnation doesn’t entirely make
    sense, (and has not already totally rejected the very idea of Christ for that reason) and/or can openmindedly accept that there might be another
    explanation that makes more sense, I offer this:  Christ wanted
    to come here because (a) the planet had gotten a bad deal, some bum
    breaks and (b) he wanted to dispel some of the illusion and delusion
    about our nature, our purpose and our destiny that had come about due to the masses of
    us not having been thinking too clearly and having been misled by a
    bunch of manipulative warlords and priests.

    I have always liked the way Vermont Royster of the Wall Street Journal
    put it in 1949 for this editorial the paper reprints every December:

    In Hoc Anno Domini

    When Saul of Tarsus set out on his journey to Damascus the whole of the
    known world lay in bondage. There was one state, and it was Rome.

    There was one master for it all, and he was Tiberius Caesar. 

    Everywhere there was civil order, for the arm of the Roman law was long.

    Everywhere there was stability, in government and in society, for the centurions saw that it was so.

    But everywhere there was something else, too. There was oppression–for those who were not the friends of Tiberius Caesar.

    There was the tax gatherer to take the grain from the fields and the
    flax from the spindle to feed the legions or to fill the hungry
    treasury from which divine Caesar gave largess to the people.

    There was the impressor to find recruits for the circuses. There were
    executioners to quiet those whom the Emperor proscribed. What was a man
    for but to serve Caesar?

    There was the persecution of men who dared think differently, who heard
    strange voices or read strange manuscripts. There was enslavement of
    men whose tribes came not from Rome, disdain for those who did not have
    the familiar visage. And most of all, there was everywhere a contempt
    for human life. What, to the strong, was one man more or less in a
    crowded world?

    Then, of a sudden, there was a light in the world, and a man from
    Galilee saying, Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s and
    unto God the things that are God’s.

    And the voice from Galilee, which would defy Caesar, offered a new
    Kingdom in which each man could walk upright and bow to none but his
    God. Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my
    brethren, ye have done it unto me. And he sent this gospel of the
    Kingdom of Man into the uttermost ends of the earth.

    So the light came into the world and the men who lived in darkness were
    afraid, and they tried to lower a curtain so that man would still
    believe salvation lay with the leaders.

    But it came to pass for a while in divers places that the truth did set
    man free, although the men of darkness were offended and they tried to
    put out the light. The voice said, Haste ye. Walk while you have the
    light, lest darkness come upon you, for he that walketh in darkness
    knoweth not whither he goeth.

    Along the road to Damascus the light shone brightly. But afterward Paul
    of Tarsus, too, was sore afraid. He feared that other Caesars, other
    prophets, might one day persuade men that man was nothing save a
    servant unto them, that men might yield up their birthright from God
    for pottage and walk no more in freedom.

    Then might it come to pass that darkness would settle again over the
    lands and there would be a burning of books and men would think only of
    what they should eat and what they should wear, and would give heed
    only to new Caesars and to false prophets. Then might it come to pass
    that men would not look upward to see even a winter’s star in the East,
    and once more, there would be no light at all in the darkness.

    And so Paul, the apostle of the Son of Man, spoke to his brethren, the
    Galatians, the words he would have us remember afterward in each of the
    years of his Lord: 

    “Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ has made us free and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. “

    There is only one way to liberty, and we have to start digging now.


    “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”

    John 8:32

  • It

    has been snowing here today, a heavy wet snowfall that sticks to the

    trees.  Branches are bending under the weight. 

    I’m not complaining about the snow.  The precip comes with a

    welcome warming trend.  Yesterday, the temperature decreased

    throughout the day, starting around fifteen degrees.

    Just to lighten my mood, make it seem

    warmer

    in here and give a little acknowledgement to the Solstice holiday, I

    turned on every light in the front part of the house. The temp was

    down

    to near zero Fahrenheit outside before I went

    to bed early this morning.  When I awoke later in the
    morning,

    it

    was up into the low twenties, a much more comfortable temperature, and

    one that makes it easier for our little woodstove to keep my

    houseplants alive.

    Recently, my body hasn’t been wanting to get to sleep early. 

    I’ve

    been tending to stay up later and later into the wee small hours, and

    then awaken when the sky grows light outside, between nine and ten AM

    this time

    of year.  I question what’s behind it, but I don’t fight

    it. 

    Making peace with my body and its rhythms is part of my healing

    process.

    Last night, I was sitting in bed reading a good book, in the climactic

    ending sequence of Uther

    by Jack Whyte.  Time flew, and when it became apparent that I

    would be awake for the Solstice Moment, about a quarter to four this

    morning, I got up and turned on the porchlight to illuminate the

    festive wreath hanging on the door of the little cabin beside our

    trailer.  It is our only outward display of holiday

    celebration.

    Then I lit some incense, a Celtic blend in harmony with my reading

    material, and some candles:  red, green and white. 
    I

    tuned

    in to the planetary consciousness and felt

    the turning of the season.  It felt good.  Back in

    bed, I

    finished one book and started the next in the series, read until I

    felt

    sleepy and then snuffed the candles and turned out all but the one

    light that is generally left on for minimal illumination when one of

    us

    is at the PS2.  Doug went on playing and tending the stove as

    I

    slept.

    [aside:  Freaky little thing -- an odd-looking, hanging,

    gooseneck-style lamp with a small cupped shade painted to look like

    the

    toon Tasmanian Devil, which hangs over the computer desk, hasn't

    worked

    for weeks.  I thought the bulb was burned out.  As I

    was

    typing the copy above, it came on, lit up.  At the same time,

    Koji, nearby, started to growl, with his hackles up... and

    there

    was light.]


    Merrie

    Yule, Y’All

    four

    more days

    until Xmas

    For the past week, I have been writing about what Christmas means to

    me, sharing some memories, and posting a few research pieces about the
    pagan roots of some

    common holiday traditions.  I was complimented by lionne

    on my research, and I must confess that I really enjoy doing

    it. 

    Whenever any person, event or random thought suggests a topic on which

    to dive into the vast library that is the internet, I do it with

    pleasure and get great kicks out of what I learn there.

    I guess there might be some of my readers who do not realize that the

    Mass of Christ or Christmas is not Baby Jesus’s birthday.  It
    just

    isn’t.  Historical documents from the time of the Roman
    Empire

    give evidence of that fact.  While I’ve no objection to
    people

    choosing any time of the year, or the whole year long, to celebrate the
    earthly incarnation of

    the Christos, my Virgoan skin crawls when they ignorantly and
    inaccurately call the

    Saturnalia holiday, “Baby Jesus’s Birthday.”  In last year’s

    Yule/Saturnalia
    blog, I wrote:

    Early

    Christians, the earliest followers of Joshua ben Joseph, apparently

    were not interested in his birthday.  By the time the
    celebration of

    Christ’s Mass began, nobody had the foggiest notion of his
    birthdate…

    either that or someone savvy about public relations decided it would
    be

    politic to ride the Saturnalian coattails.

    It is simple enough to tweak out of historical records the
    timing of

    that Roman census in Judea during which Mary had her inconveniently

    timed labor in the stable.  It was in the summer time, and a
    few years

    before that non-existent year zero from which Christians measure
    time. 

    The Urantia Book

    says He was born at the cusp, when the Sun was moving from
    Leo

    to

    Virgo.  As an astrologer, I find that quite
    fitting. 

    From the

    Heliocentric perspective, that was when the Earth was moving into

    Pisces, and it was also the time when the Celestial North Pole,

    through

    precession of the equinoxes, was tilting from Aries into

    Pisces.  That

    event neatly initiated the two-thousand-year Piscean Age,

    which is now

    yielding to the Age of Aquarius.

    Okay, so that gives us some clear clues to the seasonal timing of Baby

    Jesus’s birth, and I’ve mentioned one possible good reason for the

    early church leaders to choose to co-opt the already popular Winter

    Solstice/New Year’s Roman holiday for their Mass of Christ. 
    Now

    I’ll tell you more about Saturnalia.


     

       By

    the beginning of December, writes Columella,

    the farmer should have finished his autumn planting. Now, at the time

    of the winter solstice (December 25 in the Julian calendar), Saturnus,

    the god of seed and sowing, was honored with a festival. The

    Saturnalia

    officially was celebrated on December 17 and, in Cicero‘s time,

    lasted seven days, from December 17-23. Augustus

    attempted to limit the holiday to three days, so the civil courts

    would

    not have to be closed any longer than necessary, and Caligula extended

    it to five. Still, everyone seems to have continued to celebrate for a

    full week, extended, says Macrobius,

    by the exchange of

    sigillaria, small earthenware figurines that were sold then.

        Macrobius, in his Saturnalia, creates an

    imaginary

    symposium among pagan intellectuals that takes place then. There, he

    offers an explanation for the

    varying length of the holiday.

    Originally, it was celebrated on only one day, the fourteenth before

    the Kalends of January (December 19). With the Julian reform of the

    calendar, however, two days were added to December, and the Saturnalia

    was celebrated sixteen days before the Kalends (December 17), “with

    the

    result that, since the exact day was not commonly known–some

    observing

    the addition which Caesar had made to the calendar and others

    following

    the old usage–the festival came to be regarded as lasting for more

    days than one” (I.10.2). The original day was given over

    to the Opalia,

    honoring Ops, who personified abundance and the fruits of the earth,

    and was the consort of Saturn. As the two deities represented the

    produce of the fields and orchards, so they also were thought to

    represent heaven and earth. It was for this reason, says Macrobius

    (I.10.20), that the festivals were celebrated at the same time, the

    worshippers of Ops always sitting in prayer so that they touched the

    earth, mother of all.

        In the Roman calendar, the Saturnalia

    was designated

    a holy day, or holiday, on which religious rites were performed.

    Saturn, himself, was identified with Kronos, and sacrificed to

    according to Greek ritual, with the head uncovered. The Temple of

    Saturn, the oldest temple recorded by the pontiffs, had been dedicated

    on the Saturnalia, and the woolen bonds which fettered the feet of the

    ivory cult statue within were loosened on that day to symbolize the

    liberation of the god.


     

       It also was a festival day. After

    sacrifice at the

    temple, there was a public banquet, which Livy says was introduced in

    217 BC (there also may have been a lectisternium, a banquet for the

    god

    in which its image is placed in attendance, as if a guest).

    Afterwards,

    according to Macrobius (I.10.18), the celebrants shouted “Io,

    Saturnalia!” at a riotous feast in the temple.

        The Saturnalia was the most popular

    holiday of the

    Roman year. Catullus describes it as “the best of days,” and Seneca

    complains that the “whole mob has let itself go in pleasures.” Pliny

    the Younger writes that he retired to his room while the rest of the

    household celebrated. Cicero fled to the countryside. It was an

    occasion for celebration, visits to friends, and the presentation of

    gifts, particularly wax candles (cerei), perhaps to signify the

    returning light after the solstice, and sigillaria. Martial wrote

    Xenia

    and Apophoreta for the Saturnalia. Both were published in December and

    intended to accompany the “guest gifts” which were given at that time

    of year. Aulus Gellius relates in his Attic Nights (XVIII.2) that he

    and his Roman compatriots would gather at the baths in Athens, where

    they were studying, and pose difficult questions to one another on the

    ancient poets, a crown of laurel being dedicated to Saturn if no-one

    could answer them.

        During the holiday, restrictions were relaxed and

    the social order inverted. Gambling was allowed in public. Slaves were

    permitted to use dice and did not have to work. Instead of the toga,

    less formal dinner clothes (synthesis) were permitted, as was the

    pilleus, a felt cap normally worn by the manumitted slave that

    symbolized the freedom of the season. Within the family, a Lord of

    Misrule was chosen. Slaves were treated as equals, allowed to wear

    their masters’ clothing, and be waited on at meal time in remembrance

    of an earlier golden age thought to have been ushered in by the

    god.

      This equality was temporary, of course;

    and

    Petronius speaks of an impudent slave being asked at some other time

    of

    the year whether it was December yet. Dio writes of Aulus Plautius,

    who

    was to lead the conquest of Britain, cajoling his troops. But they

    hesitated, “indignant at the thought of carrying on a campaign outside

    the limits of the known world.” Only when they were entreated by a

    former slave dispatched by Claudius did they relent, shouting “Io,

    Saturnalia.” (If a time of merriment, the season also was an occasion

    for murder. Commodus was strangled in his bath on New Year’s eve, and

    Caracalla plotted to murder his brother during the

    Saturnalia.)


        At the end of the first century AD,

    Statius still

    could proclaim: “For how many years shall this festival abide! Never

    shall age destroy so holy a day! While the hills of Latium remain and

    father Tiber, while thy Rome stands and the Capitol thou hast restored

    to the world, it shall continue.” And the Saturnalia did continue to

    be

    celebrated as Brumalia (from bruma, winter solstice) down to the

    Christian era, when, by the middle of the fourth century AD, its

    rituals had become absorbed in the celebration of Christmas.


    The rhetorician

    Libanius said:

    The festival of the Kalends is

    celebrated everywhere as far as the limits of the Roman Empire

    extend… The impulse to spend seizes everyone…. People are not only

    generous towards themselves, but also towards their fellow-men. A

    stream of presents pours itself out on all sides…. The Kalends

    festival banishes all that is connected with toil, and allows men to

    give themselves up to undisturbed enjoyment. From the minds of young

    people it removes two kinds of dread: the dread of the schoolmaster

    and

    the dread of the stern pedagogue…. Another great quality of the

    festival is that it teaches men not to hold too fast to their money,

    but to part with it and let it pass into other hands.

    Sound familiar?

        

    (According to

    wikipedia.org,

    Libanius (Greek: Libanios)

    (ca

    314 AD – ca 394)

    was a Greek-speaking teacher of

    rhetoric of the later Roman Empire, an educated pagan of the Sophist school in an

    Empire that was turning aggressively Christian and publicly burned its

    own heritage and closed the academies.)


    So, that covers Saturnalia and Kalends, Winter Solstice through New

    Years, which roughly corresponds to the West’s annual winter

    celebration that many of us call the “Christmas holidays.”

    Yule was a Northern European celebration, already in practice when the

    conquering Romans first encountered the Celts, Saxons and
    Germans.

     

    According to 13moons.com:

    “The Winter Solstice or Yule is
    one of the Lesser Wiccan Sabbats, and

    it is also the shortest day of the year, and hence – the longest
    night.

    This usually takes place on December 20th or 21st, although it does

    sometimes occur on the 22nd or 23rd (check your calendar as it changes

    from year to year). Other than the most common name of Yule, various

    other names for the Winter Solstice include Midwinter, Yuletide (the

    Teutonic version), Alban Arthan (Caledonii Tradition, or the Druids),

    Feill Fionnain (Pecti-Wita Tradition, which falls on December 22nd).

    Yuletide lasts from December 20th through December 31st. It begins on

    “Mother Night” and ends twelve days later, on “Yule Night”, hence the

    “Twelve Days of Christmas” tradition. Alban Arthan, unlike all the

    others, is not considered a fire festival.”

    Okay, so it’s a “lesser” sabbat.  I suppose that’s
    understandable

    for a bunch of people who tend to celebrate life and
    fertility. 

    Although I do endeavor to live in the Now, I still find myself looking

    forward in time.  At summer solstice, the thought that occurs
    to

    me is that days will be getting shorter and soon the midnight sun will

    be gone. 

    At this time of year, it is not the darkness on which I focus, but
    that

    embryonic new year gestating within the frozen Earth, and the coming
    of

    the Sun. 

    Here comes the sun, here comes the sun,

    and I say it’s all right

    Little darling, it’s been a long cold lonely winter

    Little darling, it feels like years since it’s been here

    Here comes the sun, here comes the sun

    and I say it’s all right

    Little darling, the smiles returning to the faces

    Little darling, it seems like years since it’s been here

    Here comes the sun, here comes the sun

    and I say it’s all right

    Sun, sun, sun, here it comes…

    Sun, sun, sun, here it comes…

    Sun, sun, sun, here it comes…

    Sun, sun, sun, here it comes…

    Sun, sun, sun, here it comes…

    Little darling, I feel that ice is slowly melting

    Little darling, it seems like years since it’s been clear

    Here comes the sun, here comes the sun,

    and I say it’s all right

    It’s all right

    George Harrison, 1969

  • good news just when I needed it

    I was logged into my ISP just now, “cleaning my spam filter”, rescuing
    a few valid emails that had been diverted there and deleting a ton of
    spam.  That job tends to get me down because the subject lines of
    the spam run the gamut from intriguingly vague to distressingly
    explicit.  The volume increases during the holiday season, too,
    I’ve noticed.  It takes attention, discrimination and endurance to
    get through that task.

    For a drug addict, wading through that spam can be like a walk in a
    minefield.  The one that said, “take some Valium and have a
    blast,” didn’t tempt me.  I’ve never been a downer freak. 
    The ones that offer relief from depression, though — they do give me
    pause.  It would be too damned easy to poison myself, and there
    are too damned many toxin merchants out there clamoring for my
    money.  Oh for the good old days when it was just a few sleazy
    types hanging around the schoolyard whispering, “Wanna try something
    fun, little girl?  The first one’s free.”

    While I was fighting my way through the “message center,” a call came
    through on the CallWave from Greyfox, and it was good news indeed.

    In October, Michael our friend the mechanic had told Greyfox his water
    pump needed replacing.  The Old Fart had been replacing more
    coolant than oil because of a leak at the pump.  Michael told
    Greyfox that the engine would have to be hoisted out to reach the water
    pump and while he was at it he should probably change the timing belt
    because the car is an ’88 model and they usually don’t last much longer
    than that.  Greyfox went to Mountain View Auto Parts, our favorite
    because it’s a local family-owned business and their prices are
    generally much lower than the national superstores like Schucks and
    NAPA who spend so much on advertising.  The parts cost about
    $90.00 there, and would have cost as much at $250 at one of the others.

    Michael had injured his back before he got the work done.  Greyfox
    hung onto the parts and kept adding coolant and viewing the puddles
    under his car with alarm.  When the alarm edged over into panic he
    called around to a few of the local garages and was really alarmed at
    how much they wanted to charge for the work.  Michael does his
    work on his off hours at the place where he is employed, and charges us
    a lot less than the going rate for shop time.

    This weekend, Michael had recovered enough and caught up with his other
    backlog of work so that he could take the car in.    He
    discovered that the water pump problem was just a loose screw.  He
    tightened it.  When he got a look at the timing belt he could see
    that it had been replaced recently — that probably happened during the
    repairs after the wreck that rendered that car cheap enough that
    Greyfox could afford to buy it.  So Michael put everything back
    together and had Greyfox’s car back to him within a couple of
    hours.  He didn’t charge him anything.

    That was the good news.  The bad news was that the receipts for
    the parts said, “no returns after thirty days.”  But today when
    Greyfox went into Mountain View Auto, they took the parts back and gave
    him a break on the restocking fee.  He was crowing with happiness
    as he recorded his message to me.  This time of year, when
    business is slack, we live off our credit.  Today, Greyfox has
    some cash for groceries.  That’s really good news.

    I will be back later with the Christmas blog, on mistletoe and holly and other woody subjects.

  • self-control

    I have just been making dough for pizza crust.  Doug likes pizza,
    and doesn’t like tomato sauce, so we’ve been planning to make pizza
    using an alfredo sauce, lots of cheese and several meats: 
    pepperoni, chunks of “breakfast” type sausage, slices of hot links with
    reindeer meat (’tis the season to eat reindeer, y’know), and
    hamburger.  He has no interest in vegies or fruit on his
    pizza. 

    I had been thinking it was about time to use up the wheat flour I’d had
    on hand when I stopped eating wheat two years ago.  Anyhow, I
    found some packets of yeast in the fridge with freshness dates in 1999,
    last century’s — the past millennium’s — leavening.  I think
    this was something Jono and Sarah left here at the time we moved into
    this place in ’98.  To my surprise and delight, it is still alive
    and active.  The sponge rose nicely in the bowl on top of the
    woodstove.

    I added the salt and oil then and the remainder of the flour and
    kneaded it in the bowl for ten minutes before placing it back on the
    woodstove to rise again.  What I did NOT do, and what motivated me
    to sit down here and boast a bit, was this:  I did not pinch off
    any of the lovely soft fleshy-feeling yeasty wheat dough and stick it
    in my mouth.

    Mama always told me that eating raw dough would give me parasites in my
    intestines.  Since mama told me many fibs and shared a lot of
    misinformation with me during her lifetime, I chose not to heed those
    warnings.  Now I know better.  I gotta tell you the stuff was
    tempting.  It isn’t just the taste, but the mouth feel of all that
    gooey gluten.  I’ve always preferred raw bread dough and pastry
    over the finished products.  But I battled systemic yeast
    infections for years.  I’m not going back there again by my own
    hand.

    See ya later, all.  I shall be back in a while, with another Christmas blog.

  • With one week left until
    Christmas,

    I want to thank some of you for illustrating my point.  I tend, in
    my writing, to present the facts and observations that have led me to
    some conclusions, and leave the conclusions up to my readers.  One
    of my favorite clients, JadedFey, who became one of my favorite friends after I’d done some readings for her – it was she who persuaded me to blog on Xanga, by the way, in case anyone’s looking for someone to thank or blame – has called that style of exposition, “obscure.”

    I realized after reading the comments below that I was probably being,
    in Sarah’s sense, “obscure” again with my entries on some of the myths
    surrounding prevalent Christmas traditions such as Satan Claws, Gaspar,
    Melchior, and Balthasar.

    TheCrimsonNinja wrote, in response to my blog on the Three Magi:

    I always assumed
    the ‘three wise men’, like everything else in the Bible, was more
    symbolic than literal anyway. I just look at the Bible as a pre-Times bestselling novel written by a collection of anonymous authors.

    I would take vehement exception to the judgement that “everything
    in the Bible” is more symbolic than literal, and to the contention that it was written as fiction.  People have long
    been using symbolic and metaphorical figures of speech — a fine
    example of a disastrous misinterpretation of such a New Testament
    passage can be found in the recent news of a mother who killed her baby girl
    by cutting off her arms
    – but I feel it
    is safe to assume that most of what is written there is literally what
    the authors meant to say and, in many cases, what they remembered,
    understood, or believed to be true.  The propensity among
    preachers to
    freely interpret Scripture in their own symbolic terms is, in my
    opinion, one of the primary factors that have debased and devalued the
    Bible as a historical document.

    The various authors’ perceptions of reality might have been skewed, and
    in some cases
    their intentions might have been less than honorable.  After the
    end of the Babylonian captivity, a cabal of Judaic priests made a
    concerted power grab through a rewriting of Scripture, for example, and
    during the Holy Roman Empire, Justinian and Theodora convened a
    conference of tame scholars and Churchmen to rewrite existing Scripture
    to suit their beliefs and political advantage.  These are facts
    known to scholars because we have documents to compare from before and
    after the changes.

    True, some of the authors of biblical materials are now “anonymous,”
    their identities having been lost or having long been obscured by
    accident or design.  But we can also reliably trace the authorship
    of some of the Bible.  For the oldest parts of the Old Testament,
    it is fairly easy for a careful reader, for example, to determine
    whether a particular passage originates in the “E Document” (E for
    Elohim), or the “J Document” (for Jehovah), and we know the cultural origins of both documents.  Of the four authors
    of the Gospels of Christ:  Matthew, Mark, Luke and John (to give another easy example), it is
    fairly evident that Luke was a Greek who never in his life laid eyes on Jesus the Christ.  That in no way betokens anonymity.

    This admirable comment from astrohooker beautifully embodies Buddha’s words from the Kalama Sutra that I have quoted in my sidebar, the quote that concludes, “…after
    observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with
    reason and is conducive to the good and the benefit of one and all,
    then accept it and live up to it.”

    I try not to pay
    too much attention to what is said in Bible other than the common sense
    things like thou shalt not kill and stuff.

    For most people that would be a wise course, but too many people
    believe in the literal truth of every word of Holy Writ, of whatever
    religion, no matter how debased, deluded, degraded or simply untrue
    those words may be.  And far too many people, perhaps even a
    larger number than those who believe the Holy Writs themselves, believe
    the symbolic interpretations, paraphrases, distortions, and specious
    additions such as the story of the Three Magi.

    I don’t often write of my beliefs or of my religion, not nearly so
    often as I simply express them in my actions and ideas.  Please
    note that my beliefs are separate from my religion.  My basic core
    belief is that the less we believe the better off we are.  My
    personal path of self-development involves questioning all my beliefs
    and either upgrading them into the knowledge category, relegating them
    to the ignorant myth, fearful superstition, or wishful thinking
    category and dismissing them, or keeping them as working hypotheses
    pending further investigation.

    I do not believe in God.  And, NO, I am not an atheist.  The
    deity I know is nothing at all like the jealous and vengeful
    micro-managing God that most atheists don’t believe in.  I am a
    Christian who does not believe in God.  I’m a gnostic, one of
    those outcast Christians that the mainstream of Christianity, the
    Apostolic followers of Peter and Paul, despise, fear and disavow. 
    They claim that because we do not accept the distorted creed of the
    Church Fathers that allows them to piously hate Pagans, Jews and
    Muslims and subjugate women, to cite just a few of the more egregious examples, we are not truly Christian.

    I use the tag anyway because one of the alternate tags that has been
    suggested, “Jesusonian”, is meaningless to most people, and “gnostic”
    to far too many people suggests “agnostic.”  People, far too many
    people, are grossly ignorant and stupidly content with their
    ignorance.  For the benefit of  those of my readers who are
    ignorant but not content with that state, I’ll explain.  The
    gnosticism which is my religion is not Gnosticism with a capital
    “G”.  That’s a group of organizations, each with its own set of
    creeds and dogmas. 

    The gnosis I practice is simply a direct communion between my spirit
    and the Spirit of the Christos.  The deity I revere is genderless,
    non-corporeal, omnipresent and infinite.   We mortals have
    powers of Will and manifestation that some people call godlike.  I
    do not hestitate to use those powers, nor do I blame the deity when
    what I manifest jumps up and bites me in the butt.

    While the deity of my understanding manifests itself to me through my
    own mind and soul, I do not avoid the study of other people’s
    expositions of their spirituality.  That is a form of fellowship,
    of sharing the Spirit.  From my pre-teens into my thirties, I
    studied many major and minor religions.  The year I was in ninth
    grade I read both the King James Bible and Webster’s New Collegiate
    Dictionary.  While it’s true that I did learn more of value from
    the dictionary than from King James, I got some interesting stuff from
    the Bible, too, and it sparked the rest of my religious study.

    To date, I have read (if memory serves) seven separate translations and
    one paraphrase of the Christian Bible.  One paraphrase was more
    than enough.  Such travesties of self-serving misinterpretation
    are, I think, responsible for much of the cultural decadence of our
    society.  Under cover of an attempt to render the bible into
    common American English, they omit or distort many of the key concepts
    of the original work.

    After those decades of study, I have settled on the NIV, New
    International Version, as my Bible of choice when I feel it’s
    appropriate to quote the bible (usually when some bible-thumper has
    been misquoting it at me).  That is, the NIV is the one I go to
    when I need to look up a verse to quote.  Its international and
    interfaith commission of scholars and translators did an accurate and
    thorough job, and where there are conflicts over the correct
    translation of a passage the book supplies all the possibilities. 
    I like that, their giving me the option of deciding which fits
    best.  Often, however, the quotations that come to mind without my
    having to look them up are phrased in the argot of the era of King
    James.

    In my opinion, as spiritual works and guides to highly-evolved human
    conduct, there are better works in print than the Holy Bible, Qur’an,
    Torah, Popol Vuh, or any of their ilk.  Two of these I most enjoy
    and respect are The Urantia Book and Neale Donald Walsch’s Conversations with God
    To me, it stands to reason that as our species continues to evove
    intellectually, culturally, and spiritually, we naturally achieve a
    broader and deeper understanding of reality.  To rephrase that,
    the old books are obsolete.  In the absence of and toward the
    establishment of a direct communion with the Great Spirit, such
    recently channeled works can be of great assistance to the spiritual
    seeker, much more assistance than works composed millennia ago and
    perverted to the political ends of many power elites in the
    interim.   How can we expect to find God in books of human
    politics that advocate such ungodly practices as genocide and genital
    mutilation, to cite just an alliterative couple of examples?