The law of “nature” is that only the “strong” survive.  Human experience is similar in that the strong do still do better, but the social system still cares more for those less fortunate (sometimes.)  Justice still is largely perverted by the heap (as in dung piles) of honours upon those “more fortunate.”  And, Through all of this, Justice still seems to be omnipresent-even if it is applied or dolled out in the most paradoxical ways.

I’ve only the vicarious armchare experience of wolves thanks to multiple PBS-esque specials.  Wolve tend to be communal- yet not always as why else would the term “lone wolf” have entered language-it wouldn’t likely be because there wasn’t evidence that numberous examples show something successful occured to burn that expression into collective memory.  but mostly its the exception proving the rule that very few acheive anything without the interplay of community.

Community can be highly annoying as it no longer is but one’s oppinion or voice but a collective one- which just screams trouble!  I communicate what is good for me but without the acceptance of my “community” my words are made mute.  how unfair!?

Words or more properly perceptions of oppinion differ between those having oppinions.  Common Sence is another such expression meant to be Reasonable if not inevitable- yet as much as an older soul upbraiding a youngster making an odious an embarrasssing mistake-as the younger should have, could have, exhibited common sense and avoided this embassment, I say Common sense (unoriginally) is neither common nor does everyone make the same sense-there are too many ways to be right that are diametrically different philosophically from the other-yet still are successful.

But your muse on whether one can paradoxically change with acceptance, and is there any justice with such differing perception?  Yes, there is, i think.

Exceptions to any pattern exist theorectically-if only to make room for us all to have a wider experience in what is intrinsically possible.  Justice is a personal oppinion that can thus be two or more people intriscically right but exactly diametrically opposed to each other’s oppinion.  how can the opposite be true?  Paradox?  it just is….usually.

but, just because I’m blind, relatively poor by my general societal standards, diabetic and arithritic atop being somewhatdisinclined to an active life anyway,  who can instantly justify I showing myself to be a weaker person when just by being alive I’ve outdistanced so many technically stronger individuals by all evidence available should have won out over me?  for that matter, have i really won?  I don’t know but I’m a lot happier about getting the continued chance to think I am.  but i asked if i’m a lesser soul.

before I’m answered- I ask this somewhat selfishly and rhetorically-I’m not sure i’d want a logical oppinion casting doubt upon my oppinion!   I have been held up at gun point in front of my house, I have strong payable evidence that  links my troubles to exposure upon my parents parts and the unfair genetics gamble in life, and the best efforts upon my behalf by those whom love me, to honestly say, I may be wholly ignorant of justice and what you say and yet prideful and oppinionated enough to suspect I’ve gotten not just a fair deal but a generous one- and to not leave a dangler, I think I’ve just proven here I can offer a lot of words- if nothing else

I think life is a whole lot fairer than it seems it is.

Words and their meanings…

There’s a lot of “doublespeak” going on in politics these days.  Words left vague in order to interpret them however you like, or words with double meanings, usually meaning the opposite of what you’d assume. 

Slang changes the language.  Bad means good. 

Anything I may express stands a chance of being misunderstood, even if I go to great lengths to make sure I’m crystal clear, it can still be a matter of another meaning to someone else.  I recall a song by Terry Scott Taylor that talked about that–he said, “should you really reveal anything when I just misunderstand it?”

As for the extremely wealthy, the Rushpublicans want more tax cuts.  Tax breaks can sound like a good thing, but when there are reductions for the wealthy, and not the poor, or lower middle class, this is a matter of fairness.  What it does is to create a larger rich class, and a larger poor class, and eliminates the in-between.  I’m all for a flat-rate, based on earnings…that is, as long as we have to pay taxes based on earnings, which is not what I’d call fair, or legal. 

For me it is more or less getting to some binary thing really.  it is on, it is off.  I have been wrapping my mind around the thing I was taught that all life was preprogrammed with a self survival mechanism in their design but no one has to necessarily live.  I have watched people steal, lie, cheat and they not only run away with the spoils they are royalty.  Look at how the Kennedy’s rose to fame, Baron Rothchild, Donald Trump and the list rolls on.  Who is to say that an honest man can indeed rise to a position of power and prestige without knowing murderers, liars, theives and yet not be part of them?  It is possible.  I have fought with many concepts that I still feel are erroneous in their creation.  First and foremost, the very idea of complying with law.  I can surely say that I was in a part of society where my conditioning and treament of myself has been programmed into being a “good boy” an avoiding the wrong side of the law so to speak.

However, in the one hopeful thing many people have told me and I listened to is the concept of Karma.  Just suppose that indeed everyone gets the punishment for doing wrong that they deserve.  It still would not be as severe as what I would expect to be a fair compensation of justice.  Yet, justice is relative and only with the narrow solidity of something absolute like a standard, it means little really.  A murderer is released from prison for some overcrowding reasons while a marijuana seller remains in jail longer than a rapist or murderer and even a cocaine trafficker.  The victims of crime often just have to suck it up because most criminals have no monies to gain as a win in civil law suits.
I have waded in pools that I consider being part of a dark heart/dark mind sort of way of seeing things and I cannot adhere to them.  However, in a more stoic mindset, we could certaily find the moral objective and be able to remove it.  What then?  I believe that much of society has unraveled beyond repair and the very standards and means by which we keep ourselves and our governing bodies in check have been thrown out with the abortion babies and bathwater.  It may be a necessary survival mechanism to be able to do wrong in order to get what we need.  Times I feel are going to draw tighter and make people more aggressive toward each other and this overall I do not feel is going to come out well.
The pendulum has to swing back the other way I truly believe, but it might take something rather catastrophic on a grand scale to do it, if it is not too late.  The really afflicting thing for me is reading Revelations in the Bible and that part where the hearts of people will harden and so forth surely could be applied to many different eras in time, but it does make a nice fit now.