March 30, 2009
-
Human Sacrifice, Cannibalism, and Hallucinogenic Snuff
The peak of the civilization at
Teotihuacán, in North Central Mexico
was about 1700 years ago.For me, this search started with Teotihuacán and Chaco Canyon. Interested in archaeology from childhood, I was familiar with both archaeological sites through a lot of reading. My interest in the archaeology of the Prehistoric Pueblo cultures preceded my conscious recall of the past lives in which I lived in those cultures. Learning that I had once lived there only intensified my interest. I went on studying the archaeology of the area to satisfy my curiosity, and in response to my mentor’s injunction to verify past life recollections. Then, in the 1990s, I spent two winters in the 4-Corners area, visiting many ruins including Chaco Canyon.
Chaco Canyon, in New Mexico,
was occupied for about
three hundred years,
peaking around 900 years ago.One notable feature of the archaeological record in Chaco Canyon is the scarcity of human remains. The pueblos would have housed thousands of people, but very few burials have been found. Some notable exceptions are a few skeletons that appear to have been carelessly dumped into an interior room of one pueblo along with a lot of garbage, and three respectful burials of apparently high status individuals.
The elite three, two men and a woman, had all been mature adults at death, and all three had their teeth filed into a catlike appearance. Remains found at Teotihuacán and at Paquimé in Northwestern Mexico, had similarly filed teeth, but the practice has not been seen in other Prehistoric Pueblo sites of the 4-Corners. I intuited that filed teeth marked these high status people as followers of the Jaguar Cult.
above: Clava, a stone head with jaguar fangs.
Many are tenoned into outer walls at Chavín de Huántar,
and similar depictions are found at Teotihuacán.Archaeologists have traced Teotihuacán’s past to origins in several small villages that existed on the site centuries before it became a major regional cultural and trading center. When we lived there, we called the city, “Xocoma.” In its late phases, separate carvings and murals depict eagles and jaguars that some archaeologists believe, and some friends of mine and I remember, were cult figures. We recall conflict between Eagle People and Jaguar People.
above: Lanzon, a carved pillar standing in an
underground passage at Chavín de Huántar.
Its carvings combine features of men,
with jaguars, serpents, and birds.The Eagle People came to what is now North Central Mexico from the east coast of Mesoamerica, the land of the Maya. Some say that originally their ancestors had come to the Americas as refugees from Atlantis. Archaeological evidence suggests that the Jaguar people were later arrivals. None of the archaeological books or articles I read, nor any of the esoteric sources I consulted, explained where the Jaguar Cult came from. The city had been in ruins when the Aztec entered the area. They named it Teotihuacán: the place where men became gods.
above: the site of Chavín de Huántar, Peru,
where occupancy peaked about 3,000 years ago.Then, a decade or more ago, I started reading about digs at Chavín de Huántar, a pre-Inca site in Peru. They had found jaguar iconography similar to that at Teotihuacán. Carvings also appeared to depict shamanic use of hallucinogenic snuff, similar to depictions in sites of the late Teotihuacán culture. In Chavín de Huántar are depictions of Trichocereus pachanoi, the San Pedro cactus. At Teotihuacán, the hallucinogen of choice appears to have been morning glory, Ipomoea. If my intuition is correct, the Jaguars of Xocoma, if they did not originate at Chavín de Huántar, probably at least shared a common origin somewhere else.
above: clava from Chavín de Huántar,
depicting nasal discharge associated
with use of hallucinogenic snuffSome of the human remains at Chavín de Huántar show evidence of ritual cannibalism. No such evidence has been found for the early or Classical periods of Teotihuacán, but it has been found in the terminal phase there. I see in this another hint that it could have come with the Jaguar Cult. Although indigenous descendants of these people often want to deny that their ancestors were cannibals, and many mainstream archaeologists prefer to think of prehistoric Americans as noble savages, there is abundant evidence for both cannibalism and human sacrifice.
above: figure of a Xipe-Totec priest,
wearing the flayed skin of a sacrificial victim.
Earliest known images of Xipe-Totec
are at Teotihuacán, from whence it
spread, and endured into Aztec times.There is extensive evidence that prehistoric Pueblo people butchered and cooked human bodies. This includes slice and scrape marks on bones where flesh was stripped from them, and “pot polishing” on the ends of bones that were stirred as they boiled. These signs occur at outlying Chacoan sites, and at Paquimé, the latest of all Anasazi sites, in contexts that suggest it was domestic use rather than ritual mortuary defleshing. From butchering and cooking to eating is a logical jump.
It is of course possible that at least some of the meat was being prepared for consumption by domestic animals. It is also possible that those cultures did not have the taboos on cannibalism that exist in most modern cultures. “Although some anthropologists believe that the argument for human cannibalism is not yet proven, evidence that it did happen includes human bones with human teeth marks on them, and fossilised human faeces which include human proteins.” (BBC) Additionally, there is linguistic evidence in the form of words, in several Native American languages, that translate as “man corn”: food derived from human meat.
above: Duho, believed to be
a ceremonial tray for preparing
hallucinogenic snuff.Cultural remnants of the hallucinogenic snuff depicted at Teotihuacán and Chavín de Huántar live on today in shamanic divination rituals of tribes in South and Central America. Animal sacrifice is still practiced in various parts of the Americas, and occasional reports of human sacrifice surface. That human sacrifice was practiced by ancient Mayans, Olmecs, and the people of Chavín de Huántar, is widely accepted among anthropologists and archaeologists.
Despite copious physical evidence and the strong opinions of several prominent archaeologists, in the face of their own taboos and those of present-day Native tribes, the profession as a whole hesitates to be so politically incorrect as to accuse the ancestors of living Native Americans of cannibalism. I contend that words like “accuse” are inappropriate in this context. Who are we to try and retroactively impose our taboos on the ancestors? Judging such things as “wrong” and, because of that judgment, suppressing the evidence that they occurred, does a disservice to the past, the present, and the future.
Comments (13)
So so interesting. Yeah, words like judge and accuse need to be suspended when it is history and anthropology we are looking at. This is an awesome blog. Thank you.
Windigio was what my grandfather called the flesh eaters. It was more to do with their religious ways than typical daily life.
I liked this stroll down history lane with you. it reminds me of the book People of the River or any of this entertaining series by the Gears.
it is my belief that the Uto-Aztecan Indians ranged from Peru up but that they were Australian aborigines who settled onto the shores of Peru and are responsible for the images called the Nazca lines…cannot prove it but I believe when land masses were much closer the Aborigines of Australia and the Peruvian natives that have just about been erased from history by Catholic revisionists, are the same people and part of that blood line is carried on into the Pueblo and Navajo peoples. The particular “serpent” theme in their concepts of consciousness and the like. The Pueblos of New Mexico and Hopi Indian belief that past, present and future exists all at the same time or in a “flux” is very similar to “dreamtime” consciousness…anyways, I am a very layman anthropologist, but when I get to be there, I read the stones, the markings and take part..I miss Acona and how I felt when I was there…
I posted this on my FaceBook.
It’s where I live these days. Until the words return.
I Love You! (and I loved this …)
@Uncious - I enjoyed some of the Gears’ “People” series books, until they started messing around in territory I knew. When they opted for political correctness over scientific accuracy, it was obvious, and uncomfortable for me. It isn’t that I don’t understand their reasons. I understand too well.
@CastroCafe - Unlike many in the field, yours is a testable theory. DNA tracking has revolutionized the field of physical anthropology, and could do a lot more if there was more funding, and if more people were willing to submit themselves and their ancestors’ remains to testing, and to accept the results.
Some of those who were more or less willing to go along with DNA testing backed off when Kennewick man was shown to be unrelated to the modern inhabitants of the area, whose myths said they had lived there forever. My theory there is that they doubt their own myths, and rather than thinking he might have been a lone wanderer, they chose to guard their hereditary land claims by denying science.
Are you familiar with The Zuni Enigma, showing linguistic parallels between Zuni and Japanese languages, supported by historic accounts in Japan of a group of travelers who never returned? I’m not aware of any DNA work there. If it exists, it is not in the popular media, and I think it would be sensational enough to make it into the news if it was published in professional journals.
@BlueCollarGoddess - I’ll enjoy reading your words when they come back. Meanwhile, I’m pleased whenever you pop in and show your beautiful smile. You were on my mind a lot as I was researching and writing this. I guess you knew that already.
Very interesting stuff…
@SuSu - so much is not int the popular media..I have talked online with Hapax23, a wise man I admire websically anyways, and he has had this done and he spoke of a place that his research has led him to understand is pretty reliable. The problem for me is my skepticism. On my father’s side of the family, one of the “family(anoynmity)” men was made a freeman from indenturedness and given a parcel of land and married a “quadroon” which was noted on the public records. On my mother’s side, we have never found paperwork on great grandfather Eugene, he came from Vermont in an Abenaki tribe but the Eugenics program caused many of them who knew what was up to leave to go to Maine or Canada. The Wabanaki Federation took many in and provided legal means of redress against this, Eugene won and lived in a house inside the house he slept in a wigwam and kept a fire going inside the house with the windows open..upon his death, it was his wish that all the money, property remaining in his life went to the Penawaskeit tribe(Penobscot) in Old Towne, ME. We have copies of his will he handwrote out in a mix of english and abenaki. The one thing you have to understand about these indians up that way is that they are the most stubborn sons of bitches you could come across. If they do not want to move, they will put up a “silent protest” that makes Ghandi look weak. For that reason, Eugene, whom by name I beleive to be a mix of Irish and Abenaki, looked more like the Indians than did me and my grandfather on the reservation. Oddly, the reservation was also full of what looked like pale waschute Irishmen with brown eyes. Mine are green. My grandfather hated the term “injun” and did not want as much to do with the reservation as my great gran did..I got to know them both. Great gran was very grateful for what he had been given..my grandmother was an Atherton, Irish to hilt and made me eat boiled beef livah and haggis at times, but it was balanced with some of the most amazing chowdah I have ever had to this day and her fish cakes were to die for..pike and pickerel are bony fish until you pressure cook them and make them into cakes, then, there are no problems with bones. Be gorrah!
I would love to submit and find out more of my heritage by the DNA testing. Not sure who to trust still. I do lean toward’s Hap’s advice, but I haven’t quite got the coin to indulge that either the children and family come first. However, Eugene did not like paperwork and he destroyed a great deal of anything “civilized people” had given him as he very much did not like the waschute as a group, he would deal with people on a one by one basis..I believe much of my cynicism was inherited between him and my grandfather…
@CastroCafe - I know I have Amerind ancestry on both sides, but exactly what it is…???
My father says his mother’s grandmother was Hunkpapa Lakota. Maybe, or maybe that’s as reliable as the story he told about where his father’s surname came from. Family genealogists have traced it back (7 generations from me) to two brothers named Douglass and the port from which they left Scotland in the 1760s. Daddy said the name comes from an old woman whose chickens got in and scratched in her rising bread dough, splattering it on a window, so her neighbors called her “Old Lady Dough Glass.”
My mother’s parents denied their native ancestry and passed as white, but it was known in the family. She said that her maternal grandmother was half Cherokee, but I have learned that most mixed-blood Kansans and Oklahomans of that time period tended to claim Cherokee connections because it was the tribe with the best reputation and most property.
I’d love to be able to afford to get my ancestry tracked through DNA.
so many don’t want to be Kiowa’s. because they were more or less wiped out or integrated into other tribes…I love the Lady Dough Glass story…pretty cool, could be how it happened.
@CastroCafe - Naaah, my father was a storyteller. The name comes from Scots Gaelic: dubh=dark, glas=water. It’s a river valley in the Lowlands.
Even as a kid, I learned to doubt his veracity. Later on, I learned that many of those stories were ones he’d heard from his grandfather and some were true. One I never did believe then turned out to be historical fact. One of our ancestors crossed the Delaware with Washington. I remember my father pointing to the famous painting and saying that one of the men in that boat was our ancestor. It might have been a different boat, but….
@SuSu - between the Easter Bunny, Santa and Lucky the Leprichaun, your dad at least had some historical value to what he said even if it were a yarn..I believe my great grans may have embellished a bit on their stories, but then, you would expect them too in some ways as I believe as we get older, we do sweeten the bitter tea a little bit for the next generation..then again, I have diabetes and possibly that spoonful of sugar with the medicine to go down, didn’t really help, but at the time, it was the right alternative paregoric to be agreeable enough to swallow everything nearly, except cod liver oil, which, now, I have a taste for.
in our own reality we are trapped in fantasy
T