When I told Greyfox I had been incubating a blog about divine madness, he responded that there had been plenty of it in the news lately, such as the brawl between Armenian and Greek Orthodox monks at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. That wasn’t quite what I had in mind, nor was the First Amendment case in the Supreme Court over the placement of a monument to Summum’s Seven Aphorisms in a city park where there is already a monument to the Ten Commandments.
The latter, however, does come closer to what I was thinking about although both incidents are, at their roots, merely territorial squabbles. The monks in question represent large sects of a major religion and would therefore generally be considered sane. Summum, on the other hand, is, “weird,” “goofy,” “oddball,” and “crazy-ass,” according to various sources I found today on the web.
You may recall my views on the concept of normality, especially if you are one of those with whom I have disagreed on that subject recently. I am equally opinionated on the topic of sanity, but where I contend that norms are concrete, easily defined matters of statistics, sanity and mental health are fuzzier concepts, very much a matter of individual opinions and ephemeral fads.
I know that most people think a normal person is sane. Most people, however, are nuts. I mean, not only is mental illness the norm in this culture, but normal people are very much in denial about that fact, and denial is a symptom of a sort of mental illness. Finding an adult American without, for example, at least one substance addiction, is relatively difficult. The best place to look for them is among those who have undergone psychotherapy or drug treatment, and most people (normal people) consider the graduates of such programs aberrant by definition.
None of that bears directly on this topic that has been percolating through my gray matter this week. It is just background, illustrating how difficult it is to discuss madness with any hope of being understood. What I have had in my head is the social phenomenon of a person’s being “touched” by inspiration in such a way that normal beliefs, taboos, practices and habits become meaningless or abhorrent, and one steps out of the PC mode and into his or her own truth.
Naturally, when one does that, one encounters fearful reactions from others. Those who love him fear for his mental health and his ability to work in society and make a living. Those whose cherished beliefs his words and behavior challenge, fear these outré ideas he presents, and, finding him scarily unpredictable, fear him.
The word my mother most often used for “crazy” or “insane,” was, “touched.” Coming from her, it was an insult, even though the usage descended from, “touched by God,” or, “touched by spirit.” Some cultures revere their eccentrics. My culture, which mistrusts nonconformity and fears abnormality, is truly crazy. Inspired deviation from stagnant norms is the driving force behind cultural evolution.
Go nuts.