January 17, 2006

  • Obesity Week

    Some glib person decided it would be more politic to call it “Healthy
    Weight Week,” but every one of the several-a-day radio magazine or
    call-in shows I have been hearing on the subject this week has used the
    word, “obesity,” at least five times as frequently as that phrase,
    “healthy weight.”  Some of the speakers pay lip service to the
    positive spin by talking about the advantages in maintaining a
    “healthy” weight, but every one of them frames those “benefits” in
    negative terms such as avoiding diabetes and heart disease.  They
    say that obesity now outweighs smoking as the greatest risk factor for
    fatal disease.

    I have been subjected to an endless auditory parade of ignorance. 
    The callers call in hoping to have their understandable ignorance
    relieved by the “experts” and “authorities,” and often what they get is
    evasion, obfuscation, misinformation or more ignorance. 
    Personally I feel it is better to know that you’re ignorant than to
    think you got the straight skinny from an expert, when in fact what you
    got was bullshit.  I can’t help wondering how the caller to Talk of the Nation
    felt when, at the end of a show early this week, she asked the
    government expert from NIH what he thought of the glycemic index and he
    stammered momentarily and then mentioned the laboratory test they use
    to diagnose diabetes and went on to say that they don’t use the
    “glycemic index” for such diagnoses.

    Well, duh!  This is just a little quirk of mine, I suppose, but I
    would prefer to hear an honest confession of ignorance than such
    self-serving tap dancing.  I hope one of this dude’s underlings
    clued him in, but the bureaucracy being what it is I think it far more
    likely that several of the underlings just had a good laugh in the
    break room at the boss’s expense. The glycemic index isn’t a diagnostic
    tool.  I’m sure the caller knew that, and was either testing the
    government baboon or was sincerely seeking some information. 

    “Glycemic index” is a way of expressing how effective a given food
    substance is at raising blood sugar.  The “old school” of fat
    doctors either haven’t familiarized themselves with it or don’t
    “believe in” it, or both.  As far as they are concerned weight
    gain or loss depends entirely on how many calories you absorb versus
    how many calories you burn.  It’s the one-size-fits-all diet
    approach, and every one of their patients who fails is assumed to have
    cheated on the diet or exercise or lied in reporting them.  Until
    this week, I had thought that this theory was thoroughly discredited,
    but like the idea that the earth was flat and the sun traveled from one
    edge to the other each day before going to bed for the night, the idea
    hangs on and many fat doctors haven’t learned anything about the
    neurochemistry of hunger and appetite or the relative glycemic
    qualities of various types of calories.

    This damned disease I have, myalgic encephalomyelopathy / chronic
    fatigue immunodysfunction syndrome, has as one of its effects (Is it a
    sign or symptom?) fluctuating body weight.  At various times I
    have dropped between fifty and ninety pounds in a few months without
    any effort on my part to restrict calories or to exercise.  I
    didn’t change how much I eat
    or my activity level.  All that changed in some of those events
    was my taste in foods, and in one case I deliberately cut out sugar and
    several foods to which I am allergic and was addicted.  I’d start
    eating and drinking a different range of foods, and the weight would
    melt away.  Weight gain, for more “normal” people, is just as
    inexplicable and unpredictable by the old caloric model, but makes
    sense to some extent when viewed from the neurochemical and glycemic
    perspective.

    Not every one of the authorities being interviewed about America’s fat
    epidemic this week has been an ignorant and reactionary baboon.  I
    have learned a few things that have helped fill in some of the blanks,
    explaining, for example, why I hit a plateau after losing about 20% of
    my body weight when I kicked the sugar addiction, and then started
    slowly gaining some of that weight back.  It’s the “set point,” or
    settling point, the body’s tendency to seek equilibrium and “recover”
    what it has “lost.”  Sometimes, the body-mind split is a real
    drag.  Other times, though, I just view it as a challenge, another
    obstacle to overcome, another puzzle to unravel.


    AUGUSTINE VOLCANO UPDATE

    The first pic was taken four days ago by Annjannette Petree.  It
    shows the eruption cloud, presumably colored by a setting sun.

    Yesterday’s flyover by the Alaska Volcano Observatory showed the new lava dome and a cloud of steam lit by the glow from within.

    Then, this morning around 8 AM there was a new explosive eruption and
    there are currently ashfall advisories for the Kenai Peninsula. 
    In case you’re wondering, that’s a couple of hundred miles from
    here.  Unless the wind shifts again, we’re okay.  We are not
    completely out of water yet.  However, given the uncertain
    weather, a forecast for deeper cold (It’s already in the teens below
    zero.) and possible ashfall, we are loading up the car right now for a
    trip to the spring.


    Lynda
    Plettner, an Iditarod musher who lives between here and where Greyfox
    lives, had a catastrophic illness and was forced to drop out of the
    Knik 200 sled dog race last weekend.  I have known Lynda for about
    twenty years.  I know by sight most of the competitive mushers,
    especially the ones who live around here.  Lynda is one of a small
    number of them who also knows me by sight.  We met while I was
    working the summer fairs and festivals when Doug was little.

    She thought it was food poisoning, but it turned out to be a bowel
    obstruction.  Thanks to the race veterinarians, help from her race
    competitors, and a med-evac helicopter, Lynda survived.  As long
    as I have known her, she has worked hard and creatively to sustain
    herself and her dogs.  She has many friends and fans, but no big,
    deep-pockets sponsorship.  Now, having no insurance, she is tens
    of thousands of dollars in debt.  She plans to hold a fundraiser
    when she’s out of the hospital, and her friends have established a fund
    for her in our local credit union.

    You can read the details and learn how you can help at adn.com.

Comments (2)

  • the strike it rich diet “doctors” are always coming up with something new to lure in marks.  the newest catch phrase is glycemic index.
    as you said…pfft. <-[paraphrasing]

    amazes me how beautiful volcanic eruptions can be.  so destructive yet so lovely to see.  i hope the wind continues to be in your favor.

    i’m glad they were able to help lynda in time.  it’d be a damned shame to lose a strong person like that to something so treatable. 

  • Is this the woman who owned the B&B where Jono was going to learn how to mush and take care of the huskies?  I remember her laugh, it was so big and beautiful – -

Post a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *