October 11, 2004
-
Dirty Pictures
Giorgione, Giorgio de Castelfranco, painted his Venus Asleep
around 1510. She is widely thought to represent the goddess of
love. Giorgione died with this painting unfinished, and it was
finished by Tiziano de Vicellio, AKA Titian.
A quarter of a century later, around 1538,Titian woke her up and humanized her. The subject of Titian’s Venus of Urbino is believed by many critics to be a courtesan.
Mark Twain said, in Tramp Abroad:
You enter [the Uffizi] and proceed to
that most-visited little gallery that exists in the world –the
Tribune– and there, against the wall, without obstructing wrap or
leaf, you may look your fill upon the foulest, the vilest, the
obscenest picture the world possesses — Titian’s Venus. It isn’t that
she is naked and stretched out on a bed –no, it is the attitude of one
of her arms and hand. If I ventured to describe that attitude there
would be a fine howl –but there the Venus lies for anybody to gloat
over that wants to –and there she has a right to lie, for she is a
work of art, and art has its privileges. I saw a young girl stealing
furtive glances at her; I saw young men gazing long and absorbedly at
her, I saw aged infirm men hang upon her charms with a pathetic
interest. How I should like to describe her –just to see what a holy
indignation I could stir up in the world…yet the world is willing to
let its sons and its daughters and itself look at Titian’s beast, but
won’t stand a description of it in words….There are pictures of nude
women which suggest no impure thought — I am well aware of that. I am
not railing at such. What I am trying to emphasize is the fact that
Titian’s Venus is very far from being one of that sort. Without any
question it was painted for a bagnio and it was probably refused
because it was a trifle too strong. In truth, it is a trifle too strong
for any place but a public art gallery.
Roughly a century after Titian painted his Venus, around 1651, Diego de
Velázquez painted his only known female nude,The Toilet of Venus, Venus and Cupid, or Venus at her Mirror, also known as the Rokeby Venus for the hall where
it hung before being acquired by London’s National Gallery.
Velázquez isn’t known for painting nudes because he lived in Spain at the
time when the Spanish Inquisition was in action. The painting was
kept hidden during the artist’s lifetime.
In 1914, Mary Richardson, a suffragette seeking to draw attention to
the imprisonment of Emmeline Pankhurst, entered the National Gallery
with a meat axe and slashed the painting seven times before being
apprehended. She claimed it wasn’t art criticism, but political
activism. She won a medal for this and her other work toward
women’s suffrage.
Francisco de Goya’s most famous nude is the Maja, probably painted for
Godoy, Prime Minister of King Charles IV, towards the end of the 18th.
century or beginning of the 19th.
There is another Maja, too.

The clothed maja is for the first time mentioned in the diary of an
engraver and academician who paid a visit to Godoy’s palace in 1800; as
no mention to the nude is made, it is supposed that Goya painted it
later on.
Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres
(1780-1867) painted in the French neo-classic style. He painted
quite a few naked women. His most famous is the Grande Odalisque. An odalisque is a harem slave, concubine, or some such chattel.
In 1842, Ingres painted Odalisque with Slave.
And then, around 1863, Edouard Manet painted his Olympia.
Manet’s protagonist is a prostitute
–not a courtesan, as some critics have assumed Titian’s Venus to be,
but more the nineteenth-century equivalent of the Renaissance
meretrice. The distinction among these categories were not mere
niceties in Renaissance Venice. In general, a courtesan was
distinguished from a meretrice (prostitute) or puttana (whore) by her
class (or class pretensions), by her superior economic status, and by
the social status and (limited) number of her lovers. As a concomitant
of these social and “romantic” aspects of her position, a courtesan
might also claim exemption from sumptuary laws concerning dress and
legislation regarding where she might live.
(source)
And, along comes the twenty-first century and a whole new class of whores, depicted here by Kayti Didriksen.

That’s it for the art lesson for today, kiddies.
Comments (9)
Ha! I wondered where you were going with this.
Somehow that seems a combination of ‘the man who would be king’ and ‘the king has no clothes on’. heh.
Oooh, kinky! Seriously, this made me think of the old SNL sketch with Dan Akroyd and the thin woman I can’t remember her name, where he would be dressed all sleazy and show real art–probably made the censors crazy.
Xanga-gram–chance of rain is up to 30% for tomorrow, and if there is anything for me at the PO, I shall zip into Willow. Any reason for me to come all the way home?
Silky is still a not-mom.
Interesting…..
OK, I am reading all of this and enjoying it greatly, until you mentioned the “maja” term. My kids call me Maja and I go by Maja, but I didn’t know it had any significant meaning. Couldn’t find it in Webster’s. Please enlighten me, Susu. – Maja (says with trepidation)
yes! now *thats* set-up
Thanks for the info, SuSu. I was afraid that “Maja” meant something quite scandelous and morally incorrect. We’ll stick to the idea that it was the name of the painting, then I will continue as before. ;~) – Maja
Another Xanga-gram. Silky is still the same, went all kitten on me this AM.
I may get th day off, it was drizzling in Wasilla when I left, haven’t checked the weather yet.
Got my BRK knives at the PO–LOVE ‘EM!
Oh, and did I mention, I need both passenger-side tires off the parts Colt. Have the Loco guys done anything? This isn’t real urgent, I guess, but one of my existing tires is worn down past the tread.
Hope you like my new blog–it is all true!!!
Love ya, talk to you tonight, might catch the NA meeting and do some shopping.
Well that’s damned interesting! The female nudes are some of the few pieces of classical art that I really like. Ok, so some people think it’s offensive to women, but honestly… They’re lovely, what’s not to like? And of course women are painting nude more often than men, we look a hell of a lot better sprawled over a bed than they do!