April 21, 2004
-
Stale Kevlar
The U.S. Department of Defense announced a couple of weeks ago that
several criminal investgative agencies of various branches of the
military served search warrants in Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, New York,
North Carolina, Texas and Wisconsin in connection with an investigation
into sales on internet auction sites of ballistic vests.
Apparently someone has been stealing “bulletproof” (notice that the
military makes no such claim for their effectiveness) vests and selling
them.I had always understood that stealing government property was a crime,
but until now had not known that possession and sale of these military
ballistic vests is illegal. The news release says:OTVs [outer tactical vests] and SAPIs
[small arms protective inserts--ceramic plates that fit in pockets of
the vests] made exclusively for the U.S. government are not for
sale to the general public. Once the items have lost their shelf
life
or have been returned by military personnel, they are demilitarized by
total destruction through shredding and/or shearing, to prevent the
item from being restored to usable condition. They are stolen
government property if possessed or sold outside the military or law
enforcement agencies.It seems wasteful to me. And just how long is the “shelf life” of
Kevlar or ballistic ceramic? I am not so obtuse or ignorant not
to understand the rationale. The powers that be don’t want a lot
of personal armor out there. I recall a bank robbery incident in
L.A. a few years ago, when the cops encountered a gang of robbers so
well armed and armored that they were compelled to quickly requisition
some better equipment for themselves from a local gun shop. But
it’s a flimsy rationale, considering that there is civilian body armor
that is more effective than what the troops are issued. Families
of servicemen are purchasing these things and sending them to
Iraq. Gives a new meaning to “care package”, eh?It
still seems wasteful. They could issue these things to people
such as the man Greyfox sold some armament to at his stand. This
guy’s job is painting lane markings on city streets in Anchorage.
The work is done late at night when few besides rapists, robbers and
hookers are out on the street. The crews occasionally get shot at
from passing cars. Whether they’re just targets of opportunity or
their fluorescent cones blocking part of the street annoy the cruising
scofflaws, all the same they are targets and could use some body
armor. Or, how about giving the expired (still wondering about
the freshness dates on the things) vests to inner city school kids to
protect them from drive-by’s and stray bullets from gang
scuffles? They could issue them firearms to keep the bad guys
from stealing their vests, right?

Comments (5)
That’s just wrong….. I can go buy one of their frickin surplus bazookas or a jet fighter plane, but none of their kevlar?
Yeah, Mitch, the Constitution guarantees our right to keep and bear arms, but not armor. Maybe we can get it amended.
Unbelievable. Absolutely unfreakin’ believable.
This is incredible! I love the way you laid this out. I have so much to learn on how to post my own findings. You have done an excellent job. It’s easy to read and wow it is upsetting too. Very nice job!!! We all need to be aware of many things that go on.
In the library and the lights are going off again. Great writing–back soon.