April 17, 2004

  • NPD

    AND

    MEN

    A two-blog day, fancy that.  It’s not that I’m trying to make up
    for all the days I’ve missed.  No can do:  time gone is gone
    and ideas for stories are perishable goods.  This morning’s blog
    started out as just some quiz stuff, then after I got here it grew a
    paragraph of reaction to an absurd comment on my previous blog.  I
    posted that hurriedly and zipped out to the Willow Post Office (no
    goose today) to pick up Greyfox’s latest shipment of knives before they
    closed at noon.  I’ll deliver the knives to the Old Fart in
    Wasilla tomorrow when I go in for step work with my sponsee and the
    Double Trouble meeting.  That meeting for people in addiction
    recovery who also are under (or have been under) psychiatric treatment
    or taking (or have taken) psychtropic drugs for mental illness, has
    become my favorite meeting.  There’s lots less bullshit there,
    none of the rampant hypocrisy about drugs I see in AA and NA, and so
    much “cross talk” (as opposed to the series of monologues in ordinary
    meetings) that it’s almost as good as group therapy.

    When I first read that comment, the context, etc., suggested it was
    written by a woman.  When I “reached out” (as I drove into Willow)
    to get a feel for the mind that created that drivel, I wasn’t sure that
    it wasn’t a man who wrote it.  I’m still not sure, and having been
    clued in that it comes from a bogus site where they leave absurd
    comments “for shits and giggles,” I don’t care.  What it did for
    me was stimulate some thought about sexism and about the men in my
    life.  A lot of that thought centered around Charley, my fifth
    ex-husband, who was my best friend for a long time during our years
    together and after our divorce.  I don’t see him now unless I go
    to visit him, so I suppose that at least part of what used to bring him
    around here fairly often was the weed.  That’s okay.  We
    still sit and talk as always when I go over there.  He shares with
    me his unique perspective, which I would never find anywhere
    else.  I’ll save most of what I’ve been recalling and realizing
    about Charley and me for the next memoir blog.  He’s where I
    bogged down before.

    He’s a strange sort of sexist, a chivalrous chauvinist who loves women
    and defers to us quite sweetly sometimes.  Despite never having
    won an argument with me in over thirty years, and having heard, “I told
    you so,” from me countless times about his fuck-ups, he still maintains
    that men are superior.  It’s his childhood programming and I’m
    fairly certain he’s too old to change it now.  Not that he’d want
    to change, since I’m sure he gets some emotional payoff from having
    someone to feel superior to.  Charley is also codependent, always
    needing to fix the people he cares about or fix things for them. 
    I’d already started healing my codependency when I met him, and that
    created friction until it wore away the cohabitation bond between
    us.  Charley, I know, is incorrigible, unrepentantly stuck at the
    developmental phase he was in around age nineteen.  With no teeth
    and very little hair, his boyishness is not charming, but I love him
    anyway.

    Which brings me to the general topic of men, as stated in my
    title.  I grew up in the 1950s when there was a bunch of buzz
    about the Battle of the Sexes.  Women in the USA had taken off
    their aprons and put on welders’ masks for the war effort (that’s WWII,
    for you too young to remember and not paying attention in history
    class).  After the war, few of them wanted to go back to being
    accessories.  Men, in their last-ditch efforts to regain the upper
    hand, were resorting to everything from scripture to superior physical
    strength to assert their dominance.  For the first time statistics
    began to show significant numbers of women murdering their husbands and
    boyfriends by means other than poison.

    In the 1960s, the gender war escalated and the Women’s Liberation
    Movement gained momentum.  That was the time period during which I
    gained my political awareness.  For a while back then I was an
    insufferable Libber.  I’d flip the bird at any man who had the
    nerve to open a door for me (now I thank them).  If a guy whistled
    at me on the street and stuck around to give me a chance, I gave him
    holy verbal hell, the PIG!.  The time I spent in prison just
    compounded and crystallized that bad attitude toward men.  Our
    favorite pastime in there was to sit around telling stories about the
    men whose choices and actions landed us there.  There was the one
    who shot her drunken abusive husband in an alcoholic blackout… the
    one caught driving the getaway car for her boyfriend’s bank robbery…
    the one who tried to cover up her daughter’s murder after her husband
    killed the kid… you get the picture.

    After I began to gain some self-awareness through group therapy, I
    became aware of the internal contradictions between my attitude toward
    men and the fact that I always had at least one of them intimately
    involved in my life.  I came to terms with my codependency and
    started transcending it.  I realized that I and all those other
    women had made the choice to follow our men into hell, trouble, or
    whatever.  I began to look at men as my equals, for real, whether
    they saw it that way or not.  I ditched that bullshit of letting
    the pendulum swing from one extreme to the other, trading in male
    chauvinism for the myth of female superiority.  Now I will take
    on, in debate, anyone who cares to assert that either gender is better
    than the other.  Men need to accept that they and their
    forefathers earned the distrust and disrespect of women through their
    oppression.  Women need to accept the responsibility for their own
    choices and realize that their grandmothers (and even they, themselves)
    have been co-conspirators in their own oppression.

    I don’t romanticize man-woman relations.  Aside from the
    physical/sexual part of it, which is a very big and wonderful subject,
    one of the things I appreciate most about men is that other perspective
    I gain on things when one of them will bother to express himself openly
    to me.  It is quite OTHER, indeed. The Urantia Book says that we
    are like two alien species inhabiting the same planet.  The
    differences in the way we think are hardwired, part of the
    electrochemistry of our brains.  That there are women who think
    like men and men who think like women does not refute that contention,
    not when you take a look at their biochemistry and
    neurophysiology.  When I refer to Greyfox as my “soulmate”, I
    don’t mean some romantic ideal of someone I can’t live without. 
    Nor do I mean anything even remotely close to a “twin-soul” whose
    thoughts and feelings run in the same ways mine do.  Soulmate, in
    my lexicon, is strict reincarnationist jargon for someone with whom
    I’ve shared a series of past lives and with whom I have strong karmic
    connections.  He’s not my only soulmate, as anyone knows who has read my
    memoirs and/or the exchanges of comments here between Sarah and me.

    But Greyfox is apparently the one with whom I had the most to resolve
    in this life, karma from as long ago as ancient feudal Asia and bands
    of wandering warrior monks, through the Roman Legions, up to each of
    our most recent lives before this one.  I like to imagine that
    some of my mentors, people like E.J. Gold, Edgar Cayce, and Dick
    Sutphen, might be aware of this and understand from it that they taught
    me well and that I’m taking care of business.  This shit won’t
    happen again, fellas.  Which brings me to the other half of that
    title up there….

    This has been hanging fire for a few weeks.  I made a flip remark
    here about how NPD “sufferers” don’t suffer, they make the rest of us
    suffer.  It has been on my mind off and on ever since.  It’s
    not totally true although there is a kernel of truth in it.  In
    fact, when I wrote that I was quoting Greyfox.  He has said it
    several times in meetings.  It brings laughs, which is, I suppose,
    why he keeps repeating it.  But I have to set the record straight
    here so I can stop thinking about this.  When I realize I’ve made
    a misstatement, I tend to obsess over it until I correct it.

    There are so many ways in which people with narcissistic personality
    disorder suffer that I can’t enumerate them all.  Few of them ever
    find contentment in life because real life does not readily support the
    false persona on which they depend.  Their expectations are seldom
    met.  People don’t tend to give them the deference and attention
    they feel they need and deserve.  The negative feedback,
    resentment and rejection they receive as a result of their grandiosity
    and selfishness hurts their feelings, damages their self-esteem, and
    usually drives them even deeper into the false persona and delusions of
    grandeur for refuge.  …and that’s just the perceptual, emotional
    toll the disorder takes.

    NPD also affects their health and general well-being.  They are
    inherently impractical and don’t generally trust the good advice of
    those who care for them.  They injure themselves with drugs, poor
    nutrition, and the like because they have that attitude that they know
    better than all the experts.  It affects their material security
    through bad investments, and other impulsive acts such as Greyfox’s
    early retirement and move to Alaska… I could go on and on but maybe
    you get the picture.  At the very least I’ve gotten this off my
    chest and can get on to obsessing over something else.

Comments (5)

  • I’ve been observing and trying to mentally catalogue the differences between men and women ever since my acid phase. Ever notice how guys seem to have no peripheral vision? That explains the cliche of how the husband never notices the new drapes.
    I agree with you about getting that “other” perspective from men. Sometimes my husband can pinpoint some of my trickiest bullshit, and give me a much needed reality check. On the other hand, I’m the one that usually reminds him not to stress out about little things and look at the big picture. ‘Course that don’t stop us from wanting to strangle each other occasionally.

  • You’re brilliant.  But … you certainly don’t need me to tell you this.

    Thank you, for the journey, and for the thoughts.

  • I appreciate the difference between men and women, but more than that, I’m grateful for our similarities. In the big picture, we’re all just humans beings, and we have more in common with each other than not.

  • “Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus” may have been one of the greatest book titles ever created, not to mention the greatness of the words between the covers.  I’m glad I took the time to read your blog today.  The question remains, when will I have the time to delve into your history?  You appear to be among the most fascinating of my subscribees, and that’s saying a mouthful, because the people I subscribe to are the most incredibly awesome bunch of individuals I’ve ever run into.  Anyway, I’m glad to see you write that neither sex is “better” than the other.  Just way, way different.

  • Okay, this twin thing is really taking off………OCD too??!!!  Ugh……well, never a dull moment in my world anyhoos

Post a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *